Search Results for "Spot Panchnama"

1676 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1676 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Stabbing Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 335 and 452 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of the appellant under Sections 335 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The prosecution alle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal of Police Officials in Custodial Death Case. Court finds no evidence of torture or extortion under Section 330 IPC as deceased was taken to hospital and no injuries proved.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pimpri, dated 27 May 2003, acquitting two police...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand of Dowry and Harassment. Conviction under Sections 302, 304B, 498A, 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove dowry demand and cruelty beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Motiram Marotrao Bhongade, Sanjay Motiram Bhongade, Laxmibai Motiram Bhongade, and Leelabai Falke, were convicted by the 3rd Adhoc Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and House Trespass in Love Marriage Dispute — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder of his son-in-law and under Section 449 IPC for house trespass, with concurrent sentences.

The appellant, Balkrishna Khashaba Mohite, was convicted by the Sessions Court at Satara for the murder of Sunil Kakade, his son-in-law, under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows MSRTC Appeal and Claimants' Cross-Objection in Motor Accident Claim — Future Prospects Not Applicable to Deemed Income of Student. Notional Income of Deceased Student Determined at Rs. 10,000 Per Month with 40% Deduction for Personal Expenses.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents and sister of a 20-year-old male student who died in a road accident. The de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death and Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Dowry Demand and Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Sections 498-A, 304-B, and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of dowry or homicidal death.

The appellant, Vilas Ananda Vandre, was convicted by the IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, for offences under Sections 498-A, 304-B, and 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yadav Rajbahadur Ghyansingh, was convicted by the Special Judge, Mehsana, for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Siddik Ismail Kumbhar, was convicted by the learned 7th (Ad-hoc) Additional Sessions Judge, Bhuj-Kutchh in Sessions Case No.61 of 2015 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Sufficient Evidence of Vehicle Involvement. Tribunal erred in dismissing claim petition under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 despite FIR, panchnama, and eyewitness testimony establishing involvement of offending vehicle.

The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was filed by the original claimants, Simkiben Bhanabhai Rathod and another, again...