Search Results for "Sale Pending Suit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Sale Pending Suit"

3083 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3083 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Between Parents and Son — Orders Compliance with Consent Terms for Possession and Mesne Profits. Court holds that consent terms recorded in earlier proceedings are binding and executable, and that the trial court erred in dismissing the application for compliance without considering the binding nature of the consent order.

11 Oct 2018

The appellants, Nandlal Kewalramani and Shobhadevi Kewalramani, are the parents of respondent No.1, Rajesh Nandlal Kewalramani. The dispute pertains t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree Declaring Plaintiffs' Ownership of 3/4th Share in Suit Property. Agreements Executed by Co-Owners Held Not Binding on Plaintiffs' Undivided Share Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

25 Oct 2013

The appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 21 August 2003 passed by the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, in Special Civil Suit No.2107 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Land Acquisition Authority Must Stay Proceedings When Civil Suit for Specific Performance is Pending. Court Reiterates That Civil Court Jurisdiction is Barred Only When Full Relief is Available Before Special Forum Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013.

4 Aug 2026

The dispute arose out of land acquisition proceedings for the Kanhan River Project. The petitioner's father had entered into agreements with responden...

Supreme Court

Title Dispute Over Suit Property – Second Appeal Allowed – Lower Court Findings Reversed. High Court set aside concurrent findings of the Trial and First Appellate Court – Plaintiff failed to establish ownership through title deeds – Revenue records do not confer title – Suit for injunction without proving ownership not maintainable – Appeal dismissed.

19 Mar 2025

High Court correctly held that plaintiff’s documents did not prove ownership. Revenue records are not conclusive proof of title. Oral partition clai...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Civil Revision Petitions Challenging Interlocutory Orders Rejecting Applications Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Commercial Suit. Revisions Under Section 115 CPC Barred by Section 8 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and Counterclaim Against Co-Defendant Maintainable if It Concerns Plaintiff’s Rights.

25 Nov 2025

The High Court of Karnataka dealt with two civil revision petitions arising out of commercial suits filed by HDFC Bank Ltd. (plaintiff) against a borr...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Arbitration Petition No. 1070 of 2011 Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Petition Seeks Reference to ICC Arbitration in Dubai Pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement; the Judgment Text is Incomplete.

20 Dec 2012

The matter arose from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 10 December 2004 between Welspun Trading Limited (transferor) and Eupec PipeCoatings GmbH...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Appellant failed to show any substantial question of law arising from concurrent findings of courts below regarding possession and title of suit property.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a second appeal filed by Sou. Sheetal Ulhas Dangi, who was the original defendant no.22, against the judgment and decree passed by t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Company for Failure to Repay Convertible Bonds — Debt Admitted and Company Unable to Pay Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that where a debt is admitted and the company is commercially insolvent, a winding up order is justified.

30 Jul 2013

The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, as trustee for bondholders, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 ag...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.388 OF 2016

19 Dec 2016

The petitioners, a company importing and supplying ATMs to State Bank of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of MIDC Plot to Auction Purchaser in Winding Up Proceedings — Official Liquidator's Sale Confirmed Despite MIDC's Objection. Court holds that MIDC cannot refuse transfer of property sold by Official Liquidator in company winding up, as the sale is conducted under court supervision and the purchaser steps into the shoes of the company.

21 Aug 2020

The applicant, M/s. Metal Tubes and Rolling Mills, filed a Company Application seeking directions against the Regional Officer, MIDC (Respondent No.2)...

57 58 59 60 61

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)