Search Results for "Project affected persons"

608 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 608 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Consumer's Appeal in Real Estate Dispute, Setting Aside NCDRC Order and Granting Refund with Interest. The court upheld the consumer's right to terminate the agreement due to delay in possession and directed refund as per contractual terms under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the appellants before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) regarding delay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Disqualification in Tender for Supply of Micronutrient Supplements Due to Arbitrary Evaluation. Court Sets Aside Rejection of Technical Bid and Directs Re-evaluation with Transparency.

The petitioner, M/s. Pharmaveda (I) Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of specialty food products including dietetic foods, challenged its disqualification in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes ULC Act Demand for Excess Land Due to Repeal and Non-Completion of Proceedings. Demand for Rs 6,09,66,477 raised under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 set aside as proceedings were not finalized before the Act's repeal and the land was not vested in the State.

The petitioners, nine individuals, filed a writ petition challenging a demand of Rs 6,09,66,477 raised by the District Collector and Competent Authori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell, Upholds Refund of Earnest Money. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform its part of the contract under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, M/s. Dreams Construction Private Limited, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a land admeasuring 1 Hector and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Co-owner Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner without ouster, and a suit for partition is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a family dispute over property originally owned by M.A. Mohammed Ayoob. The appellant, Mohammed Hussain, filed a suit for partition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Fee Regulatory Committee's Determination in Telangana Professional College Fee Dispute. Court Sets Aside High Court's Re-determination of Fees for B.E./B.Tech Courses for Block Period 2016-2019, Upholding Expert Committee's Uniform Fee of Rs.97,000 per Student.

The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from a dispute over the fixation of fee structure for B.E. and B.Tech courses in private unaided professi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order in Service Matter — Transfer Held to be an Incident of Service. Petitioner failed to demonstrate any mala fides or violation of statutory rules in the transfer order dated 18.08.2016.

The petitioner, Alla Saheb, an Executive Engineer in the District Urban Development Cell, Vijayapur, challenged his transfer order dated 18.08.2016 pa...