Search Results for "Plaint averments"

2004 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2004 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action. Plaint Must Contain Material Facts Constituting Complete Cause of Action; Mere Filing of Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff to Interim Relief.

The case involves an appeal against an order rejecting the plaint in a suit for specific performance. The appellants, who were members of an associati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Property Suit Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC — No Prejudice to Defendants as Trial Not Commenced. Amendment sought to convert suit from injunction to partition is permissible when no evidence has been led and no vested right is affected.

The petitioners, original defendants in Regular Civil Suit No.60 of 1988, challenged the order of the Ad-hoc District Judge-8, Pune dated 10/01/2020, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Res Judicata and Limitation in Will Execution Dispute. Prior US Surrogate Court decree and delay in filing render suit not maintainable under Section 11 CPC and Limitation Act, 1963.

The suit was filed by Jaswinder Paul Batra, Brinder Batra, and Sunaina Batra (plaintiffs) against Neeru Batra, Baljit Singh, ING Vysya Bank Ltd., and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Waqf Act Jurisdiction Dispute - Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction For Non-Notified Properties, Civil Court Retains Authority For Property Status Determination.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Appellants against Respondents, setting aside the High Court order and allowing the application under Or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Trust Property Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence. Applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for recall of witness under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC, as the application was filed after a long delay and lacked bona fides.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Sau. Sumita Pradeepkumar Dixit (original defendant No. 4) against the Gangadhar Makharia Chari...