Search Results for "2021 Office Memorandum"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "2021 Office Memorandum"

596 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 596 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Insolvency Petition Under IBC Due to Absence of Operational Debt. Claim for Payment Made Under Subcontracting Arrangement Does Not Constitute Operational Debt Under Section 5(21) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as It Was Not for Goods or Services Provided by Corporate Debtor to Creditor.

10 Aug 2021

The appeal arose from a dispute under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, concerning a sugar project in Sudan financed through a Line of Credit ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Two Convicts in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Gang Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

17 Jan 2024

The case involves two appeals by convicts Ananda Sawant and Kunal Gaikwad against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhokar in Special...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order Reinstating Railway Employee in Disciplinary Case — Non-Supply of Inquiry Report Violates Natural Justice. Removal from Service Set Aside as Disciplinary Authority Failed to Provide Copy of Inquiry Report Before Imposing Penalty, Contrary to Principles of Natural Justice.

13 Mar 2023

The Union of India challenged the judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) Mumbai dated 25 November 2010 in Original Application No. 148 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Commercial Suit for Specific Performance Due to Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action and Lack of Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform her part of the agreement and did not disclose a valid cause of action for specific performance of an agreement to sell.

1 Sep 2023

The plaintiff, Miloni Shah, filed a Commercial Suit seeking specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 15th March 2019, allegedly entered into...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Suit for Recovery of Professional Fees by Chartered Accountant. Plaintiff entitled to decree under Order XXXVII CPC as defendants failed to obtain leave to defend.

1 Sep 2023

The plaintiff, a Chartered Accountant, filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the defendants for ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Bhima Koregaon-Elgaar Parishad Case Under UAP Act — No Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy or Terrorist Act. Appellant's mere presence at meetings and sharing of social media posts does not constitute an offence under Sections 13, 16, 18, 20, 38, 39, 40 of UAP Act or Sections 120B, 115, 121, 121A, 124A, 153A, 505(1)(B), 34 IPC.

17 Oct 2022

The appellant, Jyoti Jagtap, was arrested as accused No. 15 in FIR No. RC-01/2020/NIA/MUM registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge Against Arbitral Order Granting Opportunity to Cure Resolution Irregularity. Order held not an interim award under Section 2(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as it does not finally determine any issue.

1 Nov 2022

The judgment concerns two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Petitioners (RA Group) challenging an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes 75% Deposit Condition in Arbitration Award Stay — Section 36(2) of Arbitration Act Does Not Mandate Pre-Deposit. Court holds that Section 36(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not impose a mandatory pre-deposit condition for stay of an arbitral award, and the trial court erred in imposing 75% deposit without considering the petitioner's financial hardship.

7 Aug 2025

The petitioner, ITI Limited, challenged an order dated 19.04.2025 passed by the LXXXIII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge (Commercial Court), Bengal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Referred to Sole Arbitrator Despite Alleged Non-Signatory Status. Court Holds That Existence of Arbitration Agreement Between Petitioner and Respondent Is Prima Facie Established Through Email Exchange and Conduct.

6 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Sunteck Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal by Financial Creditor Against Dismissal of Section 95 Petition Due to Existing Moratorium Under Section 96 IBC — Prior Initiation of Personal Insolvency by Another Creditor Bars Subsequent Petitions Against Same Personal Guarantor

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Indian Bank, a Financial Creditor, filed a petition under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the respondent...

57 58 59 60

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)