Bombay High Court Allows Summary Suit for Recovery of Professional Fees by Chartered Accountant. Plaintiff entitled to decree under Order XXXVII CPC as defendants failed to obtain leave to defend.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, a Chartered Accountant, filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the defendants for recovery of professional fees amounting to Rs. 1,20,48,000/- along with interest at 18% per annum. The defendant No. 1 had appointed the plaintiff as its Chartered Accountant, and the plaintiff rendered services as agreed. The defendants failed to pay the fees despite demands. The suit was filed as a summary suit, and the defendants did not appear or obtain leave to defend. The court, after considering the pleadings and the fact that the defendants had no defense, decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff for the principal amount with interest at 18% per annum from the date of filing until realization. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to the decree as the defendants failed to obtain leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Summary Suit - Order XXXVII Rule 2 CPC - Recovery of Professional Fees - Plaintiff, a Chartered Accountant, rendered services to defendant No. 1 and was entitled to fees of Rs. 1,20,48,000/-. Defendants failed to appear and obtain leave to defend. Court held that the suit being a summary suit, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed. (Paras 1-5)

B) Interest - Contractual Rate - 18% per annum - The agreement between parties provided for interest at 18% per annum on overdue amounts. Court granted interest at the contractual rate from the date of filing till realization. (Para 5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree under Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for recovery of professional fees and interest, given that the defendants failed to obtain leave to defend.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff for a sum of Rs. 1,20,48,000/- with interest at 18% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till payment and/or realization.

Law Points

  • Summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC
  • Recovery of professional fees
  • Leave to defend
  • Chartered Accountant's services
  • Interest at 18% per annum
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (09) 63

Commercial Summary Suit No. 58 of 2022 with Interim Application No. 3546 of 2022

2023-09-01

Kamal Khata

2023:BHC-OS:9228

Mr. Bhavin Gada, Nishit Dhriva, Niyati Merchant, Mr. Haresh Sheth i/b. MDP & Partners, for the Plaintiff.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Summary suit for recovery of professional fees

Remedy Sought

Decree for Rs. 1,20,48,000/- with interest at 18% per annum

Filing Reason

Non-payment of professional fees by defendant No. 1 to plaintiff, a Chartered Accountant

Issues

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree under Order XXXVII CPC for recovery of professional fees and interest.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff submitted that he rendered services as a Chartered Accountant to defendant No. 1 and is entitled to fees of Rs. 1,20,48,000/- with interest at 18% per annum. Defendants did not appear or obtain leave to defend.

Ratio Decidendi

In a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC, if the defendant fails to obtain leave to defend, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed. The court must pass a decree in favor of the plaintiff for the amount claimed with interest.

Judgment Excerpts

The present suit is filed as a summary suit under Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure for recovery of an amount of Rs. 1,20,48,000/- along with interest thereon at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till payment and/or realization. The defendant No. 1 appointed the plaintiff as a Chartered Accountant and the plaintiff has rendered

Procedural History

The suit was filed as a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC. The defendants did not appear or obtain leave to defend. The court reserved judgment on 19th August 2023 and pronounced on 1st September 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XXXVII Rule 2
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Summary Suit for Recovery of Professional Fees by Chartered Accountant. Plaintiff entitled to decree under Order XXXVII CPC as defendants failed to obtain leave to defend.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support the prosecutio...