Search Results for "search and seizure before FIR"

596 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 596 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIRs in NDPS Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence Against Applicants. No Contraband Recovered from Applicants, No Prima Facie Case Made Out Under Sections 2, 22, 27 of NDPS Act.

The applicants filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.56/2006 registered with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Summoning Order in PMLA Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Special Court in Ghaziabad Lacked Jurisdiction as Money-Laundering Offence Allegedly Committed in Maharashtra, Under Section 44(1) of Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India challenging a summoning order issued by the Special Judge, Anti-C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Gang Rape Under Section 376(2)(g) IPC — Reduces Fine for Impecunious Appellant. The court found the prosecutrix's testimony credible and consistent, but reduced the fine from Rs.50,000 to Rs.5,000 due to the appellant's inability to pay.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC for gang rape. The prosecutrix was returning home on 21.7.2008 when the two...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Love Marriage Dispute — Brother-in-Law Sentenced to Life Imprisonment for Stabbing Deceased. Evidence of Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Nilesh @ Nitin Kanhere, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-6, Nagpur, for the murder of Deepak Charpe, his brother-in-law, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove last seen theory, extra-judicial confession, and recovery beyond reasonable doubt.

The Appellant, Asif Nasir Khan, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Pappu @ Prakash Pardeshi and sentenced to l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act for Illegal Transport of Poppy Straw Despite Licence. Breach of Licence Conditions Attracts Section 15(c) for Commercial Quantity, Not Section 26.

The appellant, Gangaram, was the driver of a truck carrying 10 bags of poppy straw weighing 415 kg. He was intercepted by Head Constable Shivshankar o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Brother's Murder Based on Extra-Judicial Confession and Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC sustained as sister's testimony regarding accused's confession and property dispute motive found credible and corroborated by medical evidence.

The appellant, Vishwas Nanasaheb Nimbalkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadhinglaj, for the murder of his brother Shamrao on 13th ...