Search Results for "road transport corporation"

2166 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2166 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Enhances Compensation for Widow in Motor Accident Death Case Due to Negligence of ST Bus Driver. Deceased's Income Reassessed and Future Prospects Applied to Compute Just Compensation Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Anita Arun Memane, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for the death of her ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim. Multiplier Under Section 163A Motor Vehicles Act Must Be Based on Age of Deceased, Not Dependents.

The case involves an appeal by Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. against an award of compensation under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by MSRTC Challenging Industrial Court Order Setting Aside Rent Recovery. Corporation Failed to Follow Proper Procedure Before Recovering Non-Concessional Rent from Employee Who Continued to Occupy Quarter After Transfer.

The petitioner, Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court dated 06.01.200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 11099 OF 2024

The writ petition was filed by a partnership firm, Gurudatta Infrastructures, challenging the rejection of its technical bid in a tender floated by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Deceased Engineer. Contributory Negligence Not Established; Tribunal's Assessment of Income, Multiplier, and Dependency Upheld Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) against the judgment and award dated 31-07-2006 passed by the Motor A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Reinstatement of Bus Driver in Gross Negligence Case. The Industrial Court's finding that the bus driver was not negligent was based on evidence and not perverse, and thus no interference under Article 227 was warranted.

The petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (BEST Undertaking), challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, dated 16 August 2007,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Insurance Company, Holds Mediclaim Amount Not Deductible from Motor Accident Compensation. Contractual Insurance Benefit Is Independent of Statutory Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and Cannot Be Deducted to Avoid Double Recovery.

The Supreme Court in this appeal considered the question whether amounts received by a claimant under a Mediclaim policy are deductible from the compe...