Search Results for "interest refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "interest refund"

2405 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2405 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows SIPCOT's Appeal in Lease Dispute, Sets Aside Writ Order Directing Execution of Lease Deed Without Pre-Conditions. The court held that the writ court cannot rewrite contractual terms and that the respondent must comply with allotment conditions before seeking execution of the lease deed.

21 Apr 2026

The appellant, State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu (SIPCOT), filed a writ appeal against an order dated 24.02.2023 in W.P.No.1745/201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Property Dispute Over Conflicting Agreements to Sell. Registered Agreement to Sell Prevails Over Unregistered One Where Possession Was Delivered and Part Consideration Paid.

19 Oct 2018

The case involves five second appeals arising from a property dispute over agricultural land at Mouje Bhagur. The suit property, Northern 1H 17R porti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employees' Pension Claim Despite Non-Deposit of Management Contribution — Government Resolution Clause 3 Covers Employees Who Retired Before Scheme Introduction. Prior Court Directions in Writ Petition No. 1530 of 2010 Must Be Complied With; Rejection Based on Non-Deposit of Contribution Is Invalid.

30 Jun 2026

The petitioners, three retired employees of the State of Maharashtra, challenged a communication dated 31st October 2023 from Respondent No. 3 rejecti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Settlement Commission in Customs Duty Case — Petitioner's Full Disclosure and Cooperation Justifies Settlement. Settlement Commission's Rejection of Application for Non-Disclosure of Additional Amounts Set Aside as Unreasonable Under Section 127B of Customs Act, 1962.

15 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture of vehicles in India. It filed four applications before the Settlement Commiss...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Interest Rate Reduced from 18% to 9%. The court held that the arbitrator's award did not violate public policy but reduced the interest rate as excessive under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award dated 8 October 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Dredging Contract Dispute — Interest Award Modified and Counterclaim Allowed. The court held that the arbitral tribunal's award of interest from the date of the award rather than from the date of the claim was contrary to Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and that the rejection of the employer's counterclaim for demobilization costs under Clause 73(1) was perverse.

15 May 2020

The judgment concerns two cross petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a majority arbitral award arising...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Refers Question of Law on Allowability of Expenditure under Section 40(a)(i) and Section 172 of Income Tax Act to Larger Bench. Disagreement with earlier Division Bench decision in CIT v. Orient (Goa) Pvt. Ltd. leads to referral on whether payer's non-resident status required for invoking proviso to Section 172.

5 Feb 2016

Background: The case concerns income tax appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Mining Contract Interest Dispute — Security Deposit Does Not Carry Interest Despite Delayed Refund When Contract Expressly Bars Interest. Clause 19 of Form-L Contract Under Punjab Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 1964 Precludes Interest on Security Deposit, and Section 34 CPC Does Not Apply to Contractual Deposits.

13 Jul 2026

The case involves appeals by the Appellants and its officers against a judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which directed payment of interes...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Flat Buyers Against Developer for Delayed Possession, Holds Unilateral Compensation Clause Unfair. Developer's stipulation of Rs 5 per sq ft per month as liquidated damages for delay held inadequate and unconscionable; flat buyers entitled to compensation at 6% per annum on amounts paid.

24 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by 171 flat buyers against the dismissal of their consumer complaint by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Immunity to NBCC from Legal Proceedings in Amrapali Group Case — Dismisses Modification Plea for Interest Waiver by Royalgolf Link City Projects Private Limited. Court held that NBCC, as court-appointed project management consultant, is immune from being impleaded in other forums, and that interest on diverted homebuyer funds is necessary to prevent unjust enrichment.

10 Jun 2020

The Supreme Court disposed of multiple interlocutory applications in the ongoing Amrapali Group matter. In I.A. No.49238 of 2020, NBCC (I) Ltd., appoi...

56 57 58 59 60

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)