Search Results for "employee provident fund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "employee provident fund"

657 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 657 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Refers Question of Law on Allowability of Expenditure under Section 40(a)(i) and Section 172 of Income Tax Act to Larger Bench. Disagreement with earlier Division Bench decision in CIT v. Orient (Goa) Pvt. Ltd. leads to referral on whether payer's non-resident status required for invoking proviso to Section 172.

5 Feb 2016

Background: The case concerns income tax appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Workmen's Appeal in Industrial Dispute Against Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam — Reinstatement with 30% Back Wages Upheld for Directly Engaged Gardeners. Termination During Conciliation Proceedings Violated Section 6E of U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

3 Mar 2025

The case involves appeals by workmen (Gardeners) and the employer (Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam) against a High Court judgment modifying Labour Court awards....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Trust's Appeal in Bonus Dispute Under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. The court held that a charitable trust engaged in commercial manufacturing activities is not exempt from paying bonus to its workmen, as the factories fall under the definition in the Factories Act, 1948, making the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 applicable under Section 1(3)(a).

2 Apr 2025

The dispute involved the appellant, a trust known as Workshop for Rehabilitation and Training of the Handicapped Trust (WORTH), originally established...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Counting Casual Labour Service as Qualifying Service for Pension in Kerala Fisheries Department Case. The Court held that pension is a social welfare measure and that the appellant's casual labour service should be counted for pension under Government Orders and Pension Rules.

26 Aug 2020

The appellant, V. Sukumaran, worked as a Casual Labour Roll (CLR) worker in the Fisheries Department of Kerala from 7 July 1976 to 29 November 1983, r...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Withholding of Pension and Gratuity During Pendency of Criminal Proceedings. State of Bihar's Circulars and Resolution Cannot Override Rule 43(b) of Bihar Pension Rules, 1950 Which Requires a Finding of Guilt Before Withholding Pension.

18 Mar 2020

The appellant, Dr. Hira Lal, was a Touring Veterinary Officer in Bihar who was implicated in the Fodder Scam (RC Case No.48 A/1996) and placed under s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Part-Time Librarian's Pension Claim by Counting Part-Time Service as Qualifying Service Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. The Court held that part-time service rendered by the petitioner is liable to be counted as qualifying service for pension, and directed the respondents to grant pension with arrears from the date of retirement.

15 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Shakuntala Ambadasrao Deshpande @ Anagha Arun Dharmadhikari, was appointed as a part-time Librarian on 13.6.1990 by Rashtriya Shi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits of Retired Librarian. Petitioner entitled to full pension and gratuity as her transfer to full-time post was duly approved by Education Officer.

22 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Smt. Pratibha Prakash Almast, was initially appointed as a part-time Librarian on compassionate grounds at Bharat Vidyalaya, Nawargaon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Municipal Pensioners Association Against Differential Pension Revision. Differential treatment of pre-2000 retirees violates Article 14; MCGM directed to revise pensions equally.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Mumbai Municipal Pensioners Association, representing pensioners who retired from the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Municipal Pensioners Association Against Differential Pension Revision. Classification of Pensioners Based on Retirement Date Held Arbitrary Under Article 14.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Mumbai Municipal Pensioners Association, representing pensioners who retired from the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Payment of Dues to Terminated Employee in Writ Petition — Petitioner Restricted Challenge to Dues Only, Not Termination Order. The court held that the respondents failed to establish forfeiture of gratuity under Section 4(6)(b) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and directed payment of all legal dues with interest.

23 Aug 2005

The petitioner, Shri Vishnu Ramchandra Joshi, was an employee of the Maharashtra State Textile Corporation Ltd. (MSTC) and its unit, Western India Spg...

56 57 58 59 60

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)