Search Results for "concurrent hearing"

1983 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1983 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Civil Courts. Petitioners failed to establish possession or title over suit lands; mutation entries held not conferring title under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners challenging mutation entries made in the revenue records in favor of the origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Government Circular Restricting Land Compensation Under Consent Award. Circular dated 27.02.2020 Held Ultra Vires the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 and Maharashtra Rules, 2014.

The petitioner, Sanjay Mahadeo Japkar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a Government Circular...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Government's Challenge to Reinstatement of Daily Wagers in MRTU & PULP Act Case — Termination Without Notice Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Schedule IV

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Government of Maharashtra and its officers challenging concurrent judgments of the Labour Court and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Upholds Rejection of Plaint and Decree on Counterclaim. Court holds that rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC does not require notice to plaintiff and that counterclaim can be decreed ex parte if plaintiff fails to appear.

The appellants, Smt. Vijaya Wd/o Vijay Vitthalani and her minor children, filed a suit for specific performance of contract and injunction against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Rape Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Delay in FIR. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case under Sections 376, 354, 509, 504, 201, 34 IPC, and granted bail under Section 439 CrPC.

The applicant, John Fernandes, was accused of rape and other offenses under the Indian Penal Code. The incident allegedly occurred on December 2, 2009...