Search Results for "Majority rule"

2376 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2376 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Exclusion of Counterclaim in Specific Performance Suit. Counterclaim Based on Void Minor's Agreement and Barred by Limitation Under Order VIII Rule 6-A CPC.

The petitioner, Abhishek Boke, original defendant No.1, challenged the order of the trial court dated 24.6.2016 allowing the application (Exh. No.86) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Deputy Manager in Indian Airlines Case Due to Lapsed Regulations and Violation of Natural Justice. Regulation 13 of Indian Airlines Service Regulations Held Void for Absence of Enquiry and Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Prabha D. Kannan, a former Deputy Manager (In Flight Services) of Indian Airlines Ltd., challenged her termination from service by an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Adhyaksha for Violation of Mandatory Debate Requirement. Failure to Allow Debate Under Rule 3(3) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No-Confidence against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Grama Panchayat) Rules, 1994 Renders Motion Invalid.

The petitioner, H.N. Nagaveni, was elected as Adhyaksha (President) of Palagatti Grama Panchayat on 17.12.2012. On 21.12.2013, 15 members of the Panch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appeals Against Special Court Orders Outside Bench's Territorial Limits Lie Only to Principal Seat. Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Location of Court, Not Place of Offence Under Chapter XXXI of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.

The case involved a reference to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad to determine the territorial jurisdiction for appeals against o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner unless there is clear ouster and hostile title asserted.

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Gurudayalsing Bindra (original defendant, now represented by his legal representatives as a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Insurance Company's Appeal Dismissed. Negligence of Tractor Driver Established; Multiplier Applied as per Sarla Verma Guidelines.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased Shankrappa, who died in a road accident on 19....