Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"

1872 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1872 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Reassessment — Prior Agreement Valuation Binding. Sale Deed Executed in Conformity with Assessed Agreement Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 31A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (Goa Amendment).

The petitioners, Mr. Sameer Vasudev Morajkar and Mrs. Prithvi B. Dessai, executed a sale deed dated 16.12.2020 in respect of property measuring 1900 s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Consignor's Claim Against Indian Railways for Loss of Goods Under Implied Bailment. Implied Contract of Bailment Found Between Consignor and E.P. Railway Despite Initial Contract with Pakistan Railway Under Indian Contract Act, 1872 Sections 148 and 194.

The dispute arose from the non-delivery of goods consigned in 1947 from Quebec, Pakistan, to New Delhi, India. The consignor, Amar Singh, booked goods...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Petitions in Nanded — Directs Payment of Enhanced Compensation with Interest. Landowners entitled to compensation under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for delay in payment after possession was taken.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the Nanded-Waghala Munic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Unregistered Lease Deeds as Evidence. Lease Deeds Require Registration Under Registration Act, 1908 Irrespective of Term.

The petitioner, a defendant in a civil suit, challenged an interlocutory order of the trial court that held four unregistered lease deeds produced by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal Against Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Arising from Joint Development MOU; Developer Seeks Amendment to Include Refund Claim After Dismissal of Suit.

The appeal arose from a commercial suit for specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 27.09.2004. The appellant, M/s Whitefiel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Limitation Matter — Upholds Refusal to Condone Delay of 14 Months 10 Days. Court Holds That the Lower Appellate Court's Finding of No Sufficient Cause for Delay Was Not Perverse and Does Not Warrant Interference Under Section 100 CPC.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Collector, Gadchiroli, and other officers, filed a second appeal before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, cha...