Search Results for "Larger Bench"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Larger Bench"

3964 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3964 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CBFC Cuts Imposed on Film on Drug Addiction; Holds Pre-Censorship Must Conform to Article 19(2) Reasonable Restrictions. State's Decision to Delete References to Punjab and Mutilate Content Violates Freedom of Speech Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

13 Jun 2016

The first petitioner, a film production company, sought a writ of certiorari to quash the decision of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) w...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

17 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Upholding Ancestry-Based Classification. The Court Affirms That Distinction Between 'Pushtaini' and 'Gair-Pushtaini' Landholders for Compensation Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Related Rules Has a Reasonable Nexus with Rehabilitation Objectives.

20 Feb 2023

The appeals arose from a judgment and order dated 30 March 2018 by a Full Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, which upheld a classific...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition Challenging Irrigation Restoration Charges — Rate and Area of IRC Disputed; Petitioner Alleges Discrimination and Exorbitant Demand. Issue of whether IRC should be calculated at Rs. 50,000 per hectare as per report dated 11.01.2008 instead of Rs. 1 lakh per hectare under Government Resolution dated 06.03.2009.

5 May 2016

The petitioner, a public limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in power generation, challenged the demand for Irrigatio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Petition Challenging Enhancement of GCET Weightage in Professional Admissions. Petitioners Contend Sudden Change and Misapplication of Supreme Court Judgments.

27 Jun 2005

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged a Government of Goa circular dated 4th April 2005 that assigned 100% weightage to ...

High Court

Full Bench of Bombay High Court Examines Fee Reimbursement Scheme Restriction for Minority Institution Students. Court Tasked with Resolving Conflicting Precedents on Whether Limiting Reimbursement to CAP-Admitted Students Is Discriminatory.

29 May 2020

The case concerned a challenge to a Government Resolution (GR) dated 27.02.2013 issued by the State of Maharashtra, which restricted fee reimbursement...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Appeal Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act Maintainable on Limitation Issue Even When Valuation/Rate of Duty Not Disputed. The Court ruled that the question of limitation is a distinct legal issue not relating to assessment, valuation, or rate of duty, and thus appeals challenging only the time-bar aspect are maintainable before the High Court under Section 35G.

23 Dec 2021

The case arose from a Central Excise Appeal filed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Belapur, against Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL Petition Against Electricity Ombudsman Order Limiting Recovery of Arrears Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003. Court upholds two-year limitation period for recovery of electricity charges, rejecting claim for arrears from 2003 to 2010.

24 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged an order of the Electricity Ombudsman dated December 2...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remits Reference in Central Excise Case — Original Challenge to Rule 5 Vires Unanswered. The Court held that the question referred to a larger Bench did not arise on facts and was not disputed by the assessee, and directed the Division Bench to decide the vires of Rule 5 under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Article 14 of the Constitution.

5 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court was hearing a reference arising from a Division Bench judgment in Bhuwalka Steel Industries Ltd. v. Union of India. The original cha...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Order in Succession Case for Lack of Jurisdiction to Reopen Probate Proceedings. Letters of Administration cannot be revoked under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 without a properly instituted petition and notice to all parties.

2 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Smt. Gajalakshmi, sought Letters of Administration in respect of the last will and testament of her paternal uncle, Radhakrishna Reddy...

56 57 58 59 60

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)