Search Results for "substantive offence"

2154 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2154 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4(2) and 8 of POCSO Act and Sections 376(2)(i), 363, 354-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Umesh Sanghele, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Non-Payment and Failure to Issue Taking Over Certificate. Court holds that disputes regarding interim payment certificates and issuance of TOC are arbitrable under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicants, BSI-JDN Joint Venture and others, filed four applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Forgery and Cheating Case for Using Forged Educational Documents to Secure Employment. Petitioner's Conviction Under Sections 420, 468, 471 IPC and Section 66 of IT Act Confirmed as Prosecution Proved Forgery Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The petitioner, Kashinath Dattu Kalbhor, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ahmednagar on 30.6.1997 for offences under Sections 42...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Appellant in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance of Section 50 -- Search Procedure Violated Mandatory Safeguards Under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

The Appellant, a Kenyan national, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Court for offences under Sections 22(c) and 21(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of 8-Year-Old Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Penetration and Witness Testimony Contained Material Contradictions.

The appellant, Balaji Malhari Devkate, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhokar, District Nanded for the rape of an 8-year-old girl unde...