Search Results for "statement under Section 131"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "statement under Section 131"

1045 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1045 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Interest Rate Reduced from 18% to 9%. The court held that the arbitrator's award did not violate public policy but reduced the interest rate as excessive under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award dated 8 October 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Shareholder Dispute Over Hotel Company Exit — Holds That Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Granting Relief Beyond Scope of Reference and Without Proper Valuation.

12 Jul 2024

The judgment pertains to two Commercial Arbitration Petitions arising from an arbitral award dated 5th April 2016. The petitioners (Panchamias Group a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Application for Decree of Possession Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC — No Clear Admission Found in Society's Letters. The court held that letters from the defendant society did not amount to unequivocal admissions of the plaintiff's ownership, and thus summary decree was not warranted.

5 Feb 2019

The plaintiff, Mahesh B. Chaudhary, filed a suit seeking possession of Flat No.17, 1st floor, Radha Sadan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., and a dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Application for Decree of Possession Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC — No Clear Admission Found in Society's Letters. Admission Must Be Unambiguous and Unequivocal for Judgment on Admissions; Letters Merely Acknowledging Receipt of Documents Do Not Constitute Admission of Ownership.

5 Feb 2019

The plaintiff, Mahesh B. Chaudhary, filed a suit seeking possession of Flat No.17, 1st floor, Radha Sadan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., and a dec...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Commercial Dispute. Petition Involves Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Allowing Rejection of Goods After Acceptance, Contrary to Section 42 of Sale of Goods Act.

24 Dec 2025

The petitioner, a manufacturing company, issued a purchase order to the respondent, a trading company, for the supply of stainless steel seamless tube...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Reverses First Appellate Court's Decree and Restores Trial Court's Dismissal. The Court held that the first appellate court failed to frame proper points for determination under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC, and its judgment was perverse and not based on evidence.

16 Jul 2026

The case involves a property dispute among siblings over ancestral property in Campal, Panaji, Goa. The original plaintiffs (respondents) filed a suit...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Decides Regular First Appeal Arising from Dismissal of Suit for Declaration of Property Ownership. Property Originally Allotted to a Swamiji Under Mysore Government Scheme and Later Subject to Litigation Over Inheritance and Alleged Fraud.

28 Mar 2014

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a suit for declaration of ownership of immovable property situated in Bangalore. The original plaintiff, C.R. H...

High Court

KAHC010451182019_1

14 Feb 2020

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly Not Proved and Doubtful Identification. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove common object under Section 149 IPC and identification of accused was unreliable, leading to acquittal.

12 Jan 2022

The case involves an appeal by five appellants against their conviction by the Sessions Judge, Amravati, for offences including murder under Section 3...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Claim for Overtime Wages by Timekeepers in Railway Workshop under Factories Act read with Bombay Shops and Establishments Act. The Court Held that Section 70 of the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948, by its Non-Obstante Clause, Extends Overtime Wage Protection to All Factory Employees, Not Just 'Workers' under Section 2(1) of the Factories Act, 1948.

8 May 1959

The dispute arose when timekeepers employed in the time office of the Central Railway Workshop and Factory, Parel, Bombay, filed applications before t...

55 56 57 58 59

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)