Search Results for "search and seizure before FIR"

596 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 596 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 376, 341, and 109 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Fails to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the judgment of the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, in Sessions Case No.33 of 1996, convicting...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Search and Seizure Provisions. Failure to Follow Section 42 and Section 50 of NDPS Act, 1985 Renders Recovery of Ganja Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Amol Maruti Karande, was convicted by the Special Court under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Counterfeit Currency Case Due to Lack of Mens Rea. Possession of Single Counterfeit Note Without Knowledge or Intent to Use as Genuine Not Sufficient for Conviction Under Sections 489B and 489C IPC.

The appellant, Mohammed Shabbir, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 489B (using as genuine a forged o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder of Wife Under Section 302 IPC — Life Sentence Confirmed. Drunkenness and Subsequent FIR by Accused Do Not Mitigate Offence as Evidence of Eyewitnesses and Medical Reports Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ashok Soma Misal, was convicted by the 5th Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 476/2000 for the murder of his w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with material contradictions and no independent corroboration.

The case arises from two criminal appeals filed by three accused persons convicted under Sections 302 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal...