Search Results for "receiver appointment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "receiver appointment"

573 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 573 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Testamentary Suit Seeking Probate of Will Due to Forgery and Undue Influence. The Court Held That the Propounders Failed to Prove Due Execution and Testamentary Capacity, and That the Earlier Charitable Will Remained Unrevoked.

25 Sep 2014

This testamentary suit arose from a petition for probate of the alleged last will of Jimmy Keki Tarachand, dated 27 December 2004. The original plaint...

High Court

Special Court Convicts Broker and Beneficiaries in BMC Bank Securities Fraud; Acquits Employees and Other Brokers. Broker Held Liable for Dishonest Receipt of Stolen Property Under Section 411 IPC, While Beneficiaries Convicted of Cheating Under Section 420 IPC.

18 Jan 2014

The case involved a criminal trial before the Special Court under the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 19...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Administration Suit to Implead Strangers and Challenge Alienations. Court Holds that Administration Suit Can Determine Validity of Deceased's Alienations and Implead Strangers if Circumstances Warrant.

13 Feb 2006

The plaintiff filed a suit for administration of the estate of his deceased parents, who passed away on 18 March 2002 and 28 December 2004 respectivel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies Maintainability of Revision Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Interlocutory Procedural Orders Not Revisable. Division Bench Holds That Revision Under Section 34(4) is Limited to Orders Affecting Rights or Liabilities of Parties and Does Not Extend to Purely Procedural Orders Passed Under CPC.

21 Jan 2013

The Bombay High Court was seized of three writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging orders passed by the Court of Small Causes ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Company Petition for Sanction of Scheme of Arrangement and Reduction of Share Capital. Petition Seeks to Restructure Debts and Reduce Capital Under Sections 391, 392, and 102 of the Companies Act, 1956.

17 Nov 2005

This matter pertains to a company petition filed by Sharp Industries Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction of a ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Purchasers of Property in Bombay Rents Act Dispute Over Construction Loan. Court Holds That Claim for Recovery of Loan Advanced Under Section 18(3) of the Act Arises Out of Act, Vesting Exclusive Jurisdiction in Court of Small Causes Under Section 28.

17 Oct 1969

The litigation arose from a dispute over a construction loan and the consequent failure to grant tenancy, which brought into question the jurisdiction...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Interpretation Case; Bequest to Unborn Sons Held Void Under Hindu Law. Bequest to Sons Born After Testator's Death Fails Under Tagore v. Tagore Doctrine; Life Estate to Brother Upheld, Daughters' Contingent Bequest Not Effective.

17 Sep 1969

The dispute arose from a will jointly executed on May 9, 1946 by two Hindu brothers, Krishnan Nadar and Raman Nadar, concerning the assets of Krishnan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Slum Rehabilitation Area Declaration Where No Show Cause Notice Was Issued. The Court Examines Whether Principles of Natural Justice Require Opportunity of Hearing Before Section 3C(1) Declaration Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

11 May 2011

This writ petition was filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the declaration of certain property as a Slum Rehabilitation Area under Section 3C(1...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Answers Issues in Suit for Specific Performance and Alternative Reliefs; Vendor Found to Have Breached Obligations by Not Providing Marketable Title and Not Clearing Slum Encumbrance. Illegal Termination of Agreement and Forfeiture of Earnest Declared Invalid as Vendors Failed to Perform Their Reciprocal Covenants Under the Contract.

19 Jul 2010

The plaintiff, a developer firm, entered into an agreement for sale with defendants 1 to 5 (vendors) on 1 November 1979 to purchase land with occupant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Order Under Section 95A of MHADA Act Against Non-Cooperative Members. Court Rules Mumbai Housing and Area Development Board Has Jurisdiction to Invoke Section 95A Under DCR 33(5) for Redevelopment of MHADA Layouts.

4 Feb 2010

The writ petition challenged an order of summary eviction under Section 95A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, directed agains...

55 56 57 58

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)