Search Results for "reassessment proceedings"

587 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 587 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment after four years invalid as reasons recorded did not allege any failure by assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts.

The petitioner, ICICI Bank Ltd., challenged a notice dated 30 March 2010 issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 148 of the Inco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Stock Exchange in Income Tax Case — Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Failure to Disclose. Double Deduction Ground Already Decided in Assessee's Favour for Earlier Year.

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by Bombay Stock Exchange Limited challenging a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 196...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment in Income Tax Case — Change of Opinion Not Permissible Beyond Four Years. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Set Aside as No Failure to Disclose Material Facts Was Alleged.

The petitioner, Shriram Foundry Ltd., challenged a notice dated 10 February 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Demurrage Dispute. Charter Party Agreement's Demurrage Clause Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Prove Excepted Perils.

The petitioner, Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL), challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reassessment Notices for Non-Disclosure of Reasons. Failure to Supply Recorded Reasons Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Violates Natural Justice and Renders Reopening Invalid.

The petitioner, Ajay Oxycholoride Floorings, a partnership firm, challenged two notices dated 20th February 1990 and 3rd June 1991 issued by the Assis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices for HUF Assessee in Income Tax Case — Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment. Notices under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 set aside as reasons for reopening were based on mere change of opinion and not on fresh tangible material.

The petitioner, a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) carrying on cotton ginning and pressing business, challenged four notices dated 30 March 2004 issued un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Trade Union Recognition and Election in Air India. Court upholds the validity of the recognition granted to Air India Employees Union and the election conducted under the Code of Discipline in Industry, 1958.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Air India Employees Guild and Air Corporation Employees Union challenging the recognition granted...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Proof of Income. Claimants failed to establish deceased's income as a Chartered Accountant, leading to reassessment of compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves a first appeal filed by New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nanded, i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Non-Speaking Order Under Section 17(5) of Customs Act — Directs Speaking Order Within Two Weeks. Failure to Pass Speaking Order After Payment Under Protest Violates Statutory Mandate.

The petitioner, JKC General Trading Company, a partnership firm, imported goods and was assessed customs duty by the respondents. The petitioner paid ...