ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 4 OF 1986
12 Apr 2013The petition filed under sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, sought to challenge an interim award and certain directions issued by the so...
Search Results for "ownership evidence"
3167 result(s) found
Found 3167 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Adjudicates Appeal Against Rejection of Public Trust Registration. The Court Examines Whether 'Shri Sheriche Mahadev Mandir' Qualifies as a Public Trust Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950, Based on Admissions, Management History, and Will Deed.
12 Jul 2016The case arose from an attempt to register 'Shri Sheriche Mahadev Mandir' in Jalna as a public trust under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. Th...
- 31
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute, Reverses High Court's Dismissal of Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC. The High Court's failure to frame a substantial question of law as required under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, rendered its judgment unsustainable, leading to remand for fresh consideration.
23 Apr 2025The appeal arose from a property dispute involving cancellation of sale deeds, recovery of possession, and injunction. The appellants, second to fifth...
- 342
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Permanent Injunction Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Possession and Ownership Based on Revenue Records and Prior Adjudication. Tenancy Claim and Agreement of Sale Rejected as Not Proved and Inconsistent with Earlier Proceedings.
3 Jul 2014The case pertains to a Second Appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and order dated 7.4.2007 passed by the Princip...
- 132
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order in Property Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree. Appellant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.
30 Nov -0001The appellant, Mahadeorao Satawne, filed two appeals against an order of the trial court dismissing his application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code ...
- 233
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Property Suit — Trial Court's Dismissal of Suit Upheld as Proper. The appellate court erred in remanding the suit for fresh decision without setting aside the trial court's findings on limitation and adverse possession.
28 Mar 2014The appellant, original defendant No. 1, filed an appeal against the order of remand dated 16.7.2013 passed by the District Judge-I, North Goa, at Pan...
- 118
High Court
High Court Dismisses Miscellaneous Second Appeal in Land Dispute, Upholding Trial Court's Decree and Reversing First Appellate Court's Remand Order Based on Procedural Irregularities in Amendment and Additional Evidence
27 Feb 2026The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad heard a Miscellaneous Second Appeal challenging the First Appellate Court's decision to remand a land dispute c...
- 557
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — High Court Erred in Interfering with First Appellate Court's Findings on Adverse Possession. The Court restored the First Appellate Court's judgment that dismissed the suit for partition based on findings of adverse possession and limitation under Articles 65 and 64 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
1 Jan 2026The present appeal arises from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by Veerabasamma and Malakajamma (predecessors of some respondents) a...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Recovery of Possession of Flat Based on Title Under Section 5 of Specific Relief Act — Plaintiff's Ownership Established by Registered Sale Deed and Share Certificate. The court held that the plaintiff proved her title to the suit flat through a registered sale deed and share certificate, entitling her to possession from the defendants.
24 Jun 2010The plaintiff, Sukriti Maingi, proprietress of M/s Global Maritime Organisation, filed a suit for recovery of possession of flat No.18/A in Sparsh Co-...
- 36
High Court
Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction for Theft of Electricity Under Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Dismisses Appeal Against Three Months Rigorous Imprisonment and Fine of Rs.8,820/-. Theft of Electricity by Direct Hooking Established Through Panchnama and Expert Evidence, No Requirement of Separate Sanction for Prosecution.
9 Jan 2026The appellant, Thakor Rameshji Mulchandji, was convicted by the Special Judge, Mehsana, under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for theft of el...
- 224
