Search Results for "oral tenancy"

1129 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1129 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers GST Liability on Royalty Payments to Court Receiver in Commercial Property Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Payments to a Court Receiver Under Order XL CPC Constitute Taxable Supply Under the CGST Act, 2017 and Whether GST Should be Discharged via Reverse Charge Mechanism.

The Bombay High Court, in a Court Receiver's Report arising from a commercial suit for recovery of possession of three shops used as a restaurant, exa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Using Commercial Shop for Residential Purposes Under Section 13(1)(a) of Bombay Rent Act. Change of User from Business to Residence Constitutes Acts Contrary to Section 108(o) of Transfer of Property Act, Even Without Physical Damage.

The case involves a dispute between the original plaintiff-respondent, Prabhakar Shravan Shinde, the owner of two shops in Kalyan, and the original de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision and Restores Rejection of Plaint in Suit Based on Unregistered Agreement. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Fails as Agreement Not Produced and Suit Time-Barred Under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Ajmera Enterprises (the applicant) against an order of the appellate court which had set aside...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Recasting of Issues in Tenancy Suit — No Error in Trial Court's Discretion. The Court held that the trial court's refusal to recast issues under Order XIV Rule 5 CPC was not perverse or arbitrary, as the proposed issues were already covered by existing issues.

The petitioner, Mr. Jitendra B. Mehta, filed a suit (R.A.D. Suit No.804 of 2010) before the Small Causes Court at Bombay seeking a declaration of tena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement Due to Failure to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Appellants failed to demonstrate financial capacity and timely performance under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellants, Hemant M. Deshmukh, Ashok Varma, and Gyanchand D. Oswal, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 21/12/199...