KAHC010300082015_1
27 Nov 2015The appeal arose from the conviction of two public servants employed in the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) for demanding and accept...
Search Results for "oral examination"
8285 result(s) found
Found 8285 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Considers Criminal Appeal in Disproportionate Assets Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Appellant Challenges Conviction Alleging Miscalculation of Income and Improper Sanction Under Sections 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
28 Jun 2024The appellant, a former Electrical Attender in the Public Works Department, was convicted by the trial court under Section 13(1)(e) read with Section ...
- 16
High Court
High Court Dismisses/Allows Bail to Accused in Murder Case Involving Conspiracy and Long Detention Without Trial. Scope of Section 439 CrPC and Article 21 right to speedy trial evaluated in context of parity with co-accused and threat perception.
29 Jan 2024The criminal petition was filed by accused Nos. 3 and 4 under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking bail in connection with Crim...
- 29
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Reviews Conviction in Criminal Appeal No. 343 of 2015 — Challenge to Verdict Under Section 302 IPC for Murder of Wife and Daughter Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The appeal was preferred by the husband convicted for double murder; the High Court was tasked with examining the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence and the alibi defence.
9 Dec 2020The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 26-02-2015 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Biloli, District Nanded, in Sessions Case No.38 of 201...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
16 Jun 2023The appellant, Naresh Shriram Uikey, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of Sumitra Tanuji Uikey under Section 302 IPC and for wrongful re...
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
6 Mar 2012The appellant, Abdul Riyaz Abdul Bashir, was convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Achalpur in Sessions Case No. 57/2005 for the murde...
- 82
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Wife's Appeal Against Divorce Decree in Cruelty Case. Marriage Dissolved Under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on Grounds of Mental Cruelty and Desertion.
19 Apr 2017The appellant, Savithri, wife of S. Ravindra Reddy, filed an appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act against the judgment and decree dated...
- 84
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Recalls Earlier Conviction Order and Re-Hears Appeal on Maintainability of Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. in Cheque Dishonour Case. Court Addresses Whether Second Appeal Lies Against Acquittal by First Appellate Court Under Negotiable Instruments Act.
10 Aug 2021This criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arose from a cheque dishonour complaint under Section 138 of the Neg...
- 61
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused Convicted Under NDPS Act Due to Non-Compliance of Section 42. Conviction Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Reduce Seized Information in Writing and Investigation Was Conducted by the Complainant Himself, Violating Mandatory Safeguards under Section 42 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and Sections 161 and 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
3 Feb 2021The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, acquitted the appellant who had been convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Violation of Detenu's Right to Lead Oral Evidence Before Advisory Board. Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Produce Witnesses Renders Detention Invalid.
4 Jan 2018The petitioner, wife of the detenu Vishal Salunke, challenged the detention order dated 9th August 2017 passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prev...
- 77
