Search Results for "money order refused"

2795 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2795 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Unconditional Stay of Arbitral Award Due to Stamp Duty Deficiency. Arbitration Agreement in Unstamped Member Client Agreement Held Void Ab Initio Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

The petitioner, M/s. Anand Rathi Share & Stock Brokers Ltd., challenged an order passed by the District Judge-1, Amravati, which granted unconditional...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Civil Revision on Willful Default in Rent under Hyderabad Houses (Rent, Eviction and Lease) Control Act, 1954. Tenant Challenges Concurrent Eviction Orders, Arguing Joint Family Tenancy and Non-Willful Default.

The matter arose from a civil revision application filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, challenging concurrent decis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Suspension of Sentence in Acid Attack Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. High Court's Order Based on Compensation Offer and Incarceration Period Held Insufficient Under Section 389 CrPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the victim of an acid attack, challenging the suspension of sentence and grant of bail to five convicts...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Debtor's Appeal Against NCLT Order Admitting Insolvency Application Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Maharashtra Act Moratorium Does Not Bar Insolvency Proceedings as Section 238 of the Code Overrides Inconsistent State Laws.

The appeal arose from the first application under the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The corporate debtor, a multi-product compan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Mortgage Accounting Suit; Usurious Loans Act Not Applicable as Mortgage Executed Before Its Extension to Cantonment Area.

The dispute arose from a usufructuary mortgage executed on 14 July 1933 by four mortgagors in favour of one Khanmull over a property in the Cantonment...