Search Results for "father convicted"

3093 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3093 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Juvenile Board's Decision to Try Older Juvenile as Adult in Murder Case — Section 15 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 Requires Individualized Assessment of Physical and Mental Capacity to Commit Offence.

The case involves two juveniles, aged 17.5 years and 16.5 years, accused of murdering a three-and-half-year-old child. The Juvenile Justice Board, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder of Kamlakar Sonawane set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with material contradictions and no independent corroboration.

The appellant, Yuvraj Janardhan Londhe, was convicted by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Abetment to Suicide. Conviction under Sections 498A and 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty or instigation leading to suicide.

The appellant, Shrikrishna Marotrao Thawkar, was convicted by the Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in Sessions Trial No.162 of 1998 for off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused Under Section 376/511 IPC for Attempt to Rape Minor, Enhances Sentence Due to Leniency. Conviction Rest Solely on Child Victim’s Credible Testimony and Corroborative Medical Evidence Showing Abrasion and Ruptured Hymen Without Penetration.

The case arose from an incident on 24.10.2009, in which a ten-year-old girl was sexually assaulted by her neighbour. The child had gone to the accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dattatraya Hari Jadhav, was convicted by the trial court under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of his f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband and In-laws for Murder of Married Woman by Burning. Circumstantial evidence including dying declaration and motive for dowry demand established guilt under Sections 302, 316, 498-A read with 34 IPC.

The appellants, Channappa Kallappa Hipargi (husband), Kallappa Shatyappa Hipargi (father-in-law), and Jakavva Kallappa Hipargi (mother-in-law), were c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Husband in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for killing wife sustained as chain of circumstances including motive, last seen together, and recovery of weapon was complete.

The appellant, Kistanna s/o Nama Mugawar, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife Padmabai and sente...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Lacks Completeness and Chain of Events.

The judgment arises from two criminal appeals filed by the appellants against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal in Sessions ...