High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Petitioner in Co-operative Election Writ Petition. No specific legal finding available as the judgment text is incomplete.
2 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "damage certificate"
1048 result(s) found
Found 1048 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Considers Challenge to Locking and Sealing Notice Under Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. The petitioner challenged a notice directing de-occupation of premises within seven days for alleged unauthorized construction deviations under the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
14 Feb 2025The petitioner, Mrs. P. Kavitha, claimed to be the absolute owner of a property measuring 2420 sq. ft. at Plot No. 10, Thangam Colony 1st Street, Anna...
- 37
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Time to Produce Documents in Unauthorized Construction Case Under Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act. Court Holds that Building Constructed in 2005 Without Plan Permission and in Violation of Setback Rules is Not Eligible for Regularization Under Section 113-A of the Act, Citing Supreme Court Precedent on Demolition of Illegal Structures.
19 Feb 2025The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed before the Madras High Court challenging an order dated 14.05.2024 by the A...
- 57
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition to Quash FIR Against Intermediary in Alleged Fraud. Petitioner Alleged to be Mere Intermediary Between Complainant Company and UK-Based Supplier in International Sales Contract.
21 Feb 2022The petitioner, Govindaraja, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Crimin...
- 47
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order Directing Civil Imprisonment for Breach of Temporary Injunction Under Order XXXIX Rule 2(A) of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Lower Court Found That Appellants Violated Injunction by Completing Construction and Creating Third-Party Interests Despite Court Restraints.
9 Mar 2005This appeal from order arose from a contempt application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 2(A) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The original plaintif...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Order of Industrial Court in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. The petition challenged the order directing reinstatement and backwages on grounds of lack of jurisdiction and violation of natural justice.
17 Oct 2025The writ petition challenged the order dated 28/02/2025 passed by the Industrial Court, Maharashtra at Jalna in Complaint ULP No. 225/2019. The Indust...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Industrial Court Order Directing Reinstatement of Workmen in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer Challenges Order Alleging Denial of Cross-Examination and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Recognition Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.
17 Oct 2025The writ petition arose from an industrial dispute between L. G Balakrishnan & Bros Ltd., a manufacturer of chain kits, and its workmen represented by...
High Court
BOMBAY HIGH COURT – Personality Rights and Publicity Rights Upheld – Interim Injunction Granted to Karan Johar
7 Mar 2025Judgment Emphasized the Protection of Celebrity Personality and Publicity Rights – Restriction Imposed on the Unauthorized Commercial Exploitation o...
- 544
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Child Custody Case, Setting Aside High Court's Habeas Corpus Order. The Court Held that Habeas Corpus is Not Appropriate for Custody Disputes and the Welfare of the Child is Paramount Under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, Requiring a Fresh Assessment by a Family Court.
12 Jan 2022The appeal arose from a dispute between a wife (appellant no.1) and husband (respondent no.1) over the custody of their minor son, a US citizen born i...
- 433
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.
10 May 2019The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...
- 313
