Search Results for "Premature Application"

1208 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1208 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Family Court Order Disturbing Child Custody Based on Consent Without Welfare Inquiry. The court held that a custody order under Section 8 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 cannot be passed solely on consent without considering the welfare of the child.

The case involves an appeal by the father (Appellant 'A') against a Family Court order dated 15 July 2014 that disturbed the custody of his two minor ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Executing Court's Rejection of Execution Application for Arbitral Award. Court Holds That Section 36 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Does Not Require Separate Application Under Section 34 for Execution of Arbitral Award.

The petitioner, Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited, obtained an arbitral award on 09.04.2014 directing the respondents to pay Rs. 74,094/- with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Refusal to Grant Prior Approval Under Section 36A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code for Sale of Tribal Land. Failure to Consider Petitioner's Application on Merits and Reliance on Unrelated Government Circular Renders Impugned Orders Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Kisan Songya Bangara, a tribal agriculturist, along with his family members, owned land bearing Survey No.46/2 (12.1 Ares) and Survey ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging University's Refusal to Grant Affiliation to College of Physical Education. University's Decision Upheld as Reasonable and Not Arbitrary Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed against the North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon, and other respondents. The petitioners, Pradeep Vi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Asset Disclosure Application Against Judgment Debtors Despite Suit Disposal — Order XXI Rule 41 CPC Applicable in Execution Proceedings. Court Rejects Functus Officio Argument and Holds That Existence of Security Does Not Bar Disclosure Order.

The Plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs.1.26 Crores against the Defendants, which was decreed by consent terms dated 14th June 2016, wherein the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Injunction Order in Property Dispute Between Co-Owners. Court upholds trial court's discretion to grant temporary injunction restraining alienation of jointly owned properties pending suit for partition and permanent injunction.

The petitioner, Akhil Mansuklal Mehta, and the respondent, Sheetal Deepak Karamchandani, jointly purchased three properties between 1996 and 1998: (1)...