Search Results for "Karnataka Civil Services Rules 2006"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Karnataka Civil Services Rules 2006"

767 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 767 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Employee Without Proper Domestic Inquiry — Violation of Natural Justice and Service Rules. The court held that dismissal without a proper domestic inquiry is invalid and directed reinstatement with back wages.

29 Nov 2006

The case involves a writ petition filed by Mrs. Vatsala Premchand Sarmal, the petitioner, challenging the dismissal of the First Respondent, Mr. Raghu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Penalty of Withholding 100% Pension and Gratuity in Service Matter — Disciplinary Authority's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Proportionality. The Court held that withholding entire pension and gratuity permanently is disproportionate and violative of principles of natural justice under Rule 9 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972.

17 Jan 2025

The petitioner, a retired government servant, challenged an order dated 06.02.2023 passed by the Disciplinary Authority imposing a penalty of withhold...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by National Aviation Company Challenging Regularisation Award - Petition Barred by Laches and Unexplained Delay. The court held that the petitioner's challenge to the industrial award after participating in proceedings and without challenging the reference order was not maintainable.

20 Dec 2013

The petitioner, National Aviation Co. of India Ltd., an amalgam of Indian Airlines Ltd. and Air India Ltd., and a 'State' under Article 12 of the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Common Judgment on Cross Appeals Against Order Partly Setting Aside Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute. The Court examines whether the Single Judge correctly assessed claims arising from a Build-Operate-Transfer road project, considering the State's argument on suppressed Office Note and extension of toll collection period.

4 May 2018

These appeals arise out of a common order of a single Judge of the High Court dated 12 February 2015 in three arbitration petitions challenging an arb...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Tender Dispute, Upholding Limited Judicial Review Under Article 226 of Constitution of India. The Court Reiterated That Judicial Interference in Tender Awards is Restricted to Cases of Arbitrariness or Irrationality, and Courts Must Defer to the Tendering Authority's Interpretation of Contract Terms.

17 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed a civil appeal concerning the scope of judicial review in tender matters under Article 226 of the Constitution. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

4 Dec 2017

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores POCSO and IT Act Charges in Child Pornography Case — High Court Erred in Quashing Chargesheet Without Considering Presumption of Culpable Mental State. Possession of Child Pornographic Material, Even Without Intent to Distribute, Constitutes an Offence Under Section 15(1) of POCSO and Section 67B of IT Act.

23 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Just Rights for Children Alliance and another child rights organization against the judgment of the Mad...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Forum for Trial in SEBI Act Cases — Retrospective Application of 2002 and 2014 Amendments Disputed. Court Considers Whether Change from Magistrate to Sessions Court and Subsequent Special Courts Affects Pre‑2002 Offences Still Pending.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of appeals and petitions before the Supreme Court concerned the proper forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange Board ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Regulatory Appeal on Trial Forum under Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. Procedural Amendment to Section 26 by the 2002 Amendment Act Held Retrospective, and All Pending Trials for Pre-2002 Offences Must Proceed Before Special Court as per the 2014 Amendment.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals and writ petitions concerning the correct forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange...

High Court

High Court Holds in Review Petition that CPC Amendments under Commercial Courts Act Do Not Apply to Commercial Disputes Below Specified Value. The 120‑day limit for written statement under Order VIII Rule 1 of CPC, 1908 as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is inapplicable to suits where the Specified Value is below Rs. 3 lakhs, even if the suit is before the Commercial Division under the proviso to Section 7.

1 Jun 2019

The dispute arose in a commercial suit where the Plaintiff had determined the Specified Value at Rs. 20,000, which was below the threshold of Rs. 3 la...

55 56 57 58 59

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)