Search Results for "Infructuous writ"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Infructuous writ"

881 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 881 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment to Plaint in Suit for Compensation and Declaration of Sale Agreement as Void. Amendment Sought to Challenge Agreement for Sale of Property Allegedly Purchased with Siphoned Funds Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

5 Sep 2019

The Plaintiff, Edit II Productions, filed a suit seeking compensation for financial loss caused by the Defendants who allegedly siphoned funds from th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Upgradation from Group C to Group B — Petitioner Failed to Establish Entitlement to Upgradation Under Applicable Rules.

29 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Mrs. Sheila Rajan, a retired employee, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 23/02/2015 passed by Respondent No.2, which re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

9 Oct 2015

The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ITAT's Interim Refund Order in Pending Appeal — Tribunal Cannot Direct Refund Without Adjudicating Merits Under Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to grant interim relief without hearing the main appeal, as it would render the appeal infructuous and cause prejudice to the revenue.

4 Feb 2014

The Director of Income Tax (Exemption), Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25 November 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Executing Court's Direction to Decree Holder to Obtain Permission for Sale Under Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. Executing Court Cannot Impose Obligation on Decree Holder to Obtain Permission Under Section 12 of the Act as the Duty Lies on the Judgment Debtor Transferor.

30 Aug 2013

The petitioner, Narayan s/o Govind Rekhawar, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale against the respondents, Abhijit s/o Manikr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 376(b) and (c) CrPC in Cheque Dishonour Case — No Unconstitutionality Found. Petitioners convicted under Section 138 r/w 141 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 challenged the constitutional validity of provisions relating to appeal against acquittal, but court held them intra vires.

24 Jul 2013

The petitioners, directors and a company, were convicted by the Metropolitan Magistrate on 26 July 2011 for offences under Section 138 read with Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against Minister's Revision Order in Fair Price Shop Licence Cancellation Case. Revisional Authority Cannot Enlarge Scope of Revision; District Supply Officer's Cancellation Order Restored.

31 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Balbhim Sukhdeo Limbkar, filed a complaint against respondent No.4, Manisha Nagesh Shinde, who was running a fair price shop. The Tahs...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Procedure Under Chapter VIII CrPC — Police Officers Acting as Special Executive Magistrates Must Follow Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Court Directs Strict Compliance with Sections 107, 111, 112, 116, 117 and 122 and Prohibits Unauthorized Detention and Misconduct.

7 Jun 2006

The judgment pertains to two criminal writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the practice and procedure followed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Validation Act in Import Fee Dispute. Parliament Competent to Enact Retrospective Validation to Cure Defect in Subordinate Legislation, Even if It Affects Pending Litigation.

5 May 2006

The petitioners, M/s R. Piyarelall Import & Export Ltd. and its director, challenged the constitutional validity of the Destructive Insects and Pests ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme Declaration Due to Non-Compliance with Section 90(2) of Finance Act, 1998. Court holds that the Designated Authority must consider the declaration on merits and cannot reject it solely on the ground that the declarant had not paid the tax determined under the Scheme within the prescribed time.

28 Apr 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Swam Mills Ltd., a composite textile mill, was served with 14 show cause notices for recovery of differential duty of approximate...

55 56 57 58 59

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)