WRIT PETITION NOS. 4564, 4565
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Assistant Commissioner's Order"
5547 result(s) found
Found 5547 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.
21 Feb 2011The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme Declaration Due to Non-Compliance with Section 90(2) of Finance Act, 1998. Court holds that the Designated Authority must consider the declaration on merits and cannot reject it solely on the ground that the declarant had not paid the tax determined under the Scheme within the prescribed time.
28 Apr 2006The petitioner, M/s. Swam Mills Ltd., a composite textile mill, was served with 14 show cause notices for recovery of differential duty of approximate...
- 70
High Court
High Court of Bombay Issues Suo Motu Directions to State to Ensure Proper Care for Mentally Deficient Children in Homes. State’s Failure to Implement Juvenile Justice Act Provisions Prompted Mandatory Directions for Streamlined Recognition, Management Committees, and Mental Health Care.
7 Apr 2017This suo motu Public Interest Litigation was initiated by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay on the basis of a newspaper report dated 24 August 20...
- 69
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Two Income Tax Appeals on Deduction Under Section 80-IA for Container Freight Stations. Substantial Questions of Law Include Whether CFS Qualifies as Inland Port and Scope of Assessment Under Section 153A.
21 Apr 2015The appeals before the High Court of Bombay arose from orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowing deductions under Section 80-IA(4) of the I...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPD Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Public Order Disturbance. Detenu's Preventive Detention as Dangerous Person Set Aside as In-Camera Statements Were Not Properly Considered and Bail/Notice Under Section 41-A CrPC Were Ignored.
21 Apr 2023The petitioner, Atahar Khan Amir Khan, a detenu, challenged the detention order dated 29.08.2022 passed by the Collector and District Magistrate, Akol...
- 109
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail Application Filed Under Section 482 CrPC by Accused in UAPA Case, Holding Extension of Detention and Cognizance by Non-Special Judge Void. Unlawful Extension of Detention Under Section 43-D(2) UAPA and Cognizance by Judge Not Designated Under NIA Act Rendered Proceedings Without Jurisdiction.
1 Dec 2021The matter arose from an FIR initially registered with Vishrambaug Police Station in connection with the Elgar Parishad programme held on 31st Decembe...
- 33
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Allows Writ Petition of Mutt Against Police Coercion — Police Directed Not to Interfere Without Judicial Order. Police Action of Coercing Religious Institution to Hand Over Brundavana Keys Held Illegal Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
4 Mar 2025The petitioner, Uttaradi Mutt represented by its Peethadhipathi Sri Satyatma Teertha Swamiji, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...
- 24
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Passes Order in Election Petitions Challenging Election of MP from Davanagere Constituency on Grounds of Disqualification under Section 9A of Representation of People Act, 1951 and Corrupt Practices. Petitioners Allege Acceptance of Nomination Paper Was Improper as Returned Candidate Had Subsisting Contract with Government Through His Employee, and Voters Were Subjected to Undue Influence.
16 Jan 2014The judgment pertains to two election petitions filed under Section 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 by electors of 13 Davanagere Lok ...
- 128
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Madras Converts Writ Petition into Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation for Investigation into Illegal Beach Sand Mining. The Court Clarifies that the Scope Covers All Beach Sand Minerals and that Amendments to MMDR Act, 1957 and Atomic Concession Rules, 2016 Do Not Render the PIL Infructuous for the Period Prior to 2016.
17 Feb 2025The case originated as a writ petition filed by Dr. G. Victor Rajamanickam concerning allegations of massive illegal mining and sale of Beach Sand Min...
- 88
