Search Results for "specific reference"

10232 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10232 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Title Dispute Involving Multiple Previous Suits. Court Examines Maintainability Under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC and Relief Requirements Under Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Regarding Declaration Without Consequential Possession.

The dispute originated from a property suit O.S.No.156/2010 filed by seven plaintiffs seeking declaration of title and permanent injunction regarding ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Trial Court Decree for Declaration and Possession of Party Premises; Issues of Maintainability of Representative Suit and Effect of Election Commission Recognition on Property Rights Considered

The dispute concerns premises No.3, Race Course Road, Bangalore, claimed by the Indian National Congress through its Karnataka Pradesh Congress Commit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Delivers Judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 525 of 2011. The judgment addresses the legality of conviction under Sections 302, 304B, 498A, and 201 IPC for dowry-related murder based on circumstantial evidence.

This criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application to Vacate Ex Parte Ad Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit. Allegations of Suppression of Material Facts Including Limitation of Registration in Class 25 and Prior User Evidence Are Examined.

The dispute arose from a Commercial Suit for trade mark infringement and passing off filed by Shoban Salim Thakur, sole proprietor of M/s. Family Foot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Specific Performance Claim but Orders Refund of Earnest Money with Interest in Property Sale Dispute. Plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness and additional payment of Rs. 6,75,000; only earnest money of Rs. 26,000 refundable with interest.

The dispute arose from an agreement of sale dated 21.07.2006 between the Plaintiff (Dr. Manohar Ganapathi Ravankar) and the Defendant (H. Gurunanda Ra...