Search Results for "sole accused"

2565 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2565 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor under Goa Children's Act and IPC. Testimony of victim alone held sufficient for conviction, delay in FIR explained.

The appellant, Deepak Nanku Singh, was convicted by the Children's Court, Panaji for the offence punishable under Section 8(2) of the Goa Children's A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jaysing Nayrana Bidgar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Policemen and Private Citizen in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) and Section 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was interested and testimony uncorroborated.

The case involves two appeals against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants in Criminal Appeal No.248/02 were police...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Extra-Judicial Confession and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Ramesh and Mukinda Sabhadinde, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim for the murder of their father Ramchandra under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Shailendra Manikrao Bakare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal, Upholds Murder Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Single Blow with Iron Rod on Head Causing Depressed Fracture Amounts to Murder Under Section 302 IPC as Intention to Cause Death is Inferable.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, a truck driver, for the murder of his cleaner, Mahavir Waghmare. The prosecution case rested en...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder and Dowry Death Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not supported by medical evidence.

The appellant, Sk. Javed Sk. Gulam Rasul, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad on 22nd November 2016 in Sessions Case No.162 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty or Harassment. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove dowry demand or that death was caused by burns other than accidental.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 3rd February 1996 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna in Ses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Chandrakant Nivrutti Pagar, a Talathi, was convicted by the Special Judge (Anti Corruption), Nashik for offences under Sections 7, 13(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Sheetal Anil Berlekar and Babasaheb Gangaram Daingade, were convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur for the murder of...