Search Results for "oral tenancy"

1129 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1129 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Quashing Exemption Certificate Under Section 88-B of Bombay Tenancy Act. Trust Not Registered on Tillers Day Cannot Claim Exemption; Tenants' Rights Vest on 1st April 1957.

The petitioners, tenants of agricultural lands owned by a public trust, challenged a certificate of exemption granted under Section 88-B of the Bombay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Declares Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 Ultra Vires for Lack of Legislative Competence. State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appellate Jurisdiction on Supreme Court; Provision Invalid.

The case arose from an appeal filed under Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, against an eviction order passed by the Rent Contr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act as Ultra Vires — State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appeal to Supreme Court. The provision bypassing High Court jurisdiction is invalid for lack of legislative competence under the Constitution.

The Supreme Court considered the validity of Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, which provided for a direct appeal to the Supre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in Land Tribunal Case — Occupancy Rights Upheld for Deceased Applicant's Legal Heirs. Delay Condoned and Order of Single Judge Set Aside as Land Tribunal's Grant of Occupancy Rights Was Final and Conclusive Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The case pertains to a writ appeal filed by Gudde Ningappa (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Manchappa) against an order dated 17.04.2025...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court's Decree for Mandatory Injunction. Court holds that the First Appellate Court's finding on possession was perverse and that the suit for mandatory injunction was not barred by laches.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal heirs of the original plaintiff, Shri Gurudas Yeshwant Pednekar, against the judgment of the Firs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Suit for Possession Based on Title and Prior Possession Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Within 12 Years.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the plaintiffs (appellants) against the concurrent judgment and decree of the Trial Court and First Appella...