Search Results for "notification bringing into force"

665 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 665 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Leave to Appeal Against Acquittal as Time-Barred Under Section 378 CrPC. Limitation period for filing appeal against acquittal by State is 90 days from date of judgment; application filed after 1 year 3 months is barred by limitation.

The State of Maharashtra filed an application for leave to appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against an order dated 12t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Daily Wagers Challenging Termination by Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. — Petitioners Failed to Prove 240 Days of Continuous Service Under Section 25-B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment pertains to four writ petitions filed by daily wagers (Kisan Atmaram Kasti, Hari Shravan Randive, Manohar Shripat Sakharkar, and Yogeshwa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Co-owner's Title in Ancestral Property Despite Consolidation Officer's Order Expunging Name. Section 49 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 Does Not Confer Power to Divest Pre-existing Tenure Holder's Ownership Rights.

The case concerns a dispute over ancestral land in village Mustafabad, Haridwar, originally owned by Angat, who had three sons: Ramji Lal, Khushi Ram,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Delay Condonation in Mutation Entry Challenge. Court holds that delay in challenging mutation entry cannot be attributed to petitioner when authorities failed to comply with statutory duty under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

The petitioners, Shankarrao Premaji Banarase and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur challenging the order dated 30/0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Resolution Professional to Continue CIRP Under IBC Despite Pending Winding-Up Petition Under Companies Act, 1956. Leave under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 granted to proceed with Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The judgment concerns Company Application No. 10 of 2017 filed by the Resolution Professional of Murli Industries Limited (the corporate debtor) under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenges to Cancellation of Non-Creamy Layer Certificates. Petitioners Contend Income from Salary of Group C Employees Should Be Excluded Under Office Memoranda of Central Government.

The matter concerned two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging orders withdrawing Non-Creamy Layer certifica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petitions Against Royalty Demands for Excavation During Building Construction Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Petitioners Argue Excavation Incidental to Permitted Construction Does Not Constitute Mining.

The Bombay High Court heard four writ petitions challenging the demand of royalty and penalty by revenue authorities for excavation carried out during...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of NBFC in Income Tax Dispute on Set-off of Speculation Loss. Principal Business Determined by Actual Activities, Not Registration; Amendment to Explanation to Section 73 Held Prospective.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Calcutta High Court in an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning the assessment yea...