Search Results for "limitation extension"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "limitation extension"

1145 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1145 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay in Filing Section 34 Petition as Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration Act is Not Extendable Beyond 30 Days. Delay of 31 days beyond the prescribed period of three months cannot be condoned as the proviso allows only a further 30 days and no more.

29 Apr 2016

The applicant, Jolly Brothers Pvt. Ltd., filed a Notice of Motion seeking condonation of delay of 31 days in filing a petition under Section 34 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Found to Be in Conflict with Public Policy and Patent Illegality. The Court held that the Arbitral Tribunal's interpretation of the contract was perverse and ignored the express terms, leading to a miscarriage of justice.

9 Jun 2026

The dispute arose out of a contract between ABB India Limited (Petitioner) and Sunil Hariram Jaisingh and Others (Respondents) for the supply and inst...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Two Regular First Appeals Filed Against Trial Court Judgments in Property Dispute. Appeals Challenge Dismissal of Declaration Suit and Decree of Partition Suit Based on Conflicting Gift Deeds and Succession Claims.

3 Aug 2021

The High Court of Karnataka took up two Regular First Appeals (RFA No.1285/2008 and RFA No.731/2014) for common disposal, arising from two original ci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Holds Trial Court Can Frame Preliminary Issue Under Section 9-A CPC Disposing of Suit in Part. The Court interprets Section 9-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Maharashtra Amendment) to allow partial disposal of suit or cause of action on preliminary issue of jurisdiction.

18 Jul 2024

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to answer a reference on whether a trial court, under Section 9-A of the Code of Civil Procedu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Rejects Application for Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Court holds that a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell is not barred by limitation when the agreement is undated and the plaintiff alleges continuous readiness and willingness.

20 Aug 2011

The appellant, Sunil Agrawal, filed Special Civil Suit No. 510 of 2010 in the court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Aurangabad, seeking specific perf...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Advocates Challenging Police Verification for Gun Licenses — No Fundamental Right to Carry Firearms. Requirement of Police Verification Under Arms Act, 1959 is a Reasonable Restriction and Not Arbitrary.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves five writ petitions filed by legal practitioners (advocates) challenging the requirement of police verification for grant of firearm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favor of PepsiCo Due to Absence of Valid Arbitration Agreement. The Court Held That Without a Signed Contract Containing an Arbitration Clause, the Arbitrator Lacked Jurisdiction to Entertain the Claim.

17 Apr 2012

The case involves a challenge by PepsiCo India Holding Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner) against an arbitral award dated 7 January 2010 passed by a sole arbitrat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Limitation period for filing petition under Section 34 runs from date of receipt of award, and application under Section 33 does not extend limitation if not made within prescribed period.

7 Aug 2019

The applicant, Schokhi Industrials Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Against Employer for Unfair Labour Practices in MRTU & PULP Act Case. Employer directed to reinstate employee with full back wages and permanency benefits for engaging in unfair labour practices under Items 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

21 Oct 2005

The petitioner, M/s Gannon Dunkerley & Co. Ltd., a public limited company engaged in supply of textile machinery and civil construction, challenged th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Order on Maintainability of Settlement Application Under Section 32E of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Holds That Order of Adjudication Is Made on Date of Dispatch, Not Date of Signing

15 Mar 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Vishnu Steels, a manufacturer of excisable goods, challenged an order of the Settlement Commission dismissing its application und...

54 55 56 57 58

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)