CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3301 OF 2018
9 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "legal malafide"
1100 result(s) found
Found 1100 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition for Return of Minor Child to USA in International Parental Child Abduction Case. Court holds that the child's removal from USA to India by mother was not wrongful under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction as India is not a signatory, and the child's best interests lie in India pending custody proceedings.
22 Dec 2023The petitioner, Sanil Sreekumar, an Indian citizen residing in the USA, filed a habeas corpus petition seeking the return of his minor daughter Ananya...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Lease Dispute Over Condition Precedent. Letter of Acceptance with Condition of Government Approval Does Not Form Concluded Contract Under Indian Contract Act.
25 Apr 2022The case involves an appeal by Mystical Techplast Pvt. Ltd. against the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC) concerning a lease of t...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows CBSE Class 10 Student to Appear for Compartment Exam Despite Missing Regular Exam Due to Medical Reasons. Clause 41.2 of CBSE Bye-laws restricting eligibility for compartment exam to only those who appeared in regular exam is struck down as arbitrary and violative of Article 14.
21 Sep 2020The petitioner, a 16-year-old girl student of Class 10, challenged Clause 41.2 of the CBSE Examination Bye-laws and a Circular dated 12.08.2020 which ...
- 93
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Grant of Scheme to Another Developer. Court upholds SRA's decision based on eligibility criteria and policy, finding no arbitrariness or violation of principles of natural justice.
22 Dec 2020The Petitioners, Dyna Estate Pvt. Ltd. (a developer) and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Nagar Sahakari Griha Nirman Sanstha (a proposed cooperative society of...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Ex-Serviceman's Petition Against Cancellation of Surplus Land Allotment - Violation of Natural Justice and Limitation. The court set aside the cancellation order passed after 8 years without notice, restoring the allotment of three acres of surplus land to the petitioner.
2 Mar 2010The petitioner, an ex-serviceman, was allotted three acres of surplus land out of Gut No. 19A at village Sangvi (Karadkhed) in Degloor Tahsil in the y...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Law Officer Group B in Police Department — No Right to Appointment by Mere Participation in Selection Process. Petitioner Failed to Establish Illegality in Appointment of Respondent No.3 Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
8 Jun 2011The petitioner, Ms. Surekha Ragho Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a w...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Partnership Dispute — Unregistered Partnership Bar Under Section 69(2A) of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 Applies to Suit for Accounts and Dissolution. The court held that the trial court must frame and decide the preliminary issue of maintainability under Section 69(2A) before proceeding with the suit.
11 Jul 2011The appeal arose from a suit filed by the plaintiff (Respondent No.1) against the defendants (Appellants) seeking accounts and dissolution of an unreg...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Property Suit, Remands for Fresh Consideration on Issue of Possession and Limitation. The court held that the lower appellate court's findings on possession were perverse and not based on evidence, requiring a fresh adjudication on limitation and adverse possession under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
30 Nov -0001The case involves three second appeals arising from a suit for possession filed by Salvador Quadros (respondent/plaintiff) against Conceicao Quadros a...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors of Housing Society in Cheque Dishonour Case — No Vicarious Liability Without Specific Role in Day-to-Day Affairs. Directors of a cooperative housing society cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of cheques issued by the society unless they are shown to be in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business of the society at the time of the offence.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, who were Directors of a cooperative housing society, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with S...
- 140
