Search Results for "interest under Section 30(4)"

769 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 769 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Insurance Company's Liability in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Established. Deceased was a passenger in a mini bus that overturned due to rash driving; compensation awarded to legal heirs under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 20-03-2003 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nanded, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeals Against Acquittal for Murder and Threat, Upholds Conviction Under Section 325 IPC. Acquittal for Offences Under Sections 302 and 506(II) Read with Section 34 IPC Upheld Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Non-Explanation of Accused's Injuries.

The State of Maharashtra filed two appeals against the judgment and order of the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 431 of 1989...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence Not Proved. Deceased Auto Driver Died in Single-Vehicle Capsize; No Evidence of Third-Party Involvement or Negligence, Hence Employer and Insurer Not Liable Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a claim petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased, Govindaraj, who died in a motor vehicle accident on February...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder of Wife by Axe Blow. Conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed as evidence of eye-witness son, medical evidence, and motive established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ashok Ganpati Shinde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Islampur, for the murder of his wife Sakhubai on 4 June 2004 at a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Application for Enforcement of Scheme in Sanghi Motors (Bombay) Limited. Scheme formulated under Sections 397, 398, 402 of Companies Act, 1956 involves transfer of oxygen undertaking assets and cylinders.

The matter pertains to Company Application No.328 of 1990 arising out of Company Petition No.128 of 1985, filed before the High Court of Judicature at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Adjudicates Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 498A, 304B IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. Appeal Raises Questions on Reliability of Dying Declaration and Sufficiency of Evidence Where Prosecution Witnesses Turned Hostile.

The criminal appeal arose from the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bagalkot in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demolition of Residential Structures Without Notice Under Gujarat Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 2012. Demolition Without Prior Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Article 300A of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Kureshi Irfanbhai Mohammadsharifbhai and others, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Rental Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Petitioner entitled to rental compensation from date of possession till award under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for land taken for octroi post.

The petitioner, M/s. Devi Construction LLP, owned lands in survey Nos.10 (part), 11 (part) and 160 (part) of Village Wakad, Taluka Mulshi, Dist. Pune,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Municipal Demolition Case — High Court Cannot Direct Reconstruction of Demolished Structure. The court held that the power to demolish illegal structures is vested in the municipal corporation and courts cannot direct reconstruction even if procedure was violated.

The case involves appeals by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai against a High Court order directing reconstruction of a demolished structure...