Search Results for "discretionary orders"

2005 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2005 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Section 140(3)(iv) of CGST Act on Transitional Credit for Pre-GST Stock. Petitioners Argue Arbitrary Cut-Off Date Leads to Double Taxation and Discrimination.

A group of manufacturers and traders, including JCB India Limited, manufacturers of excavators and loaders, filed writ petitions before the Bombay Hig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010403282026_2

The petitioner, a partnership firm, challenged the award of a rate contract for supply of Liquid Sodium Hypochlorite Solution 5% 5ltr (drug code 430) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Entry of Petitioner as Suspect in Charge-Sheet Holding Naming Suspect Without Evidence Illegal. Describing Person as Suspect in Police Report Under Section 173 CrPC Violates Procedure Established by Law and Right to Reputation Under Article 21.

The dispute arose from the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) paper scam case. The Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) registered an FIR on 20 June...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010521472015_1

The plaintiff, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in developing resorts and health clubs, entered into an agreement to purcha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Kerala High Court Considers Territorial Jurisdiction Challenge in Writ Petition for Appointment as Assistant Manager (Engineer-Fire). Pending Criminal Case and Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause Form Basis for Objection Under Article 226(2) of Constitution of India.

The writ petition was filed before the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner, Karthik M I, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Filed After Decades on Grounds of Delay, Laches, and Suppression of Facts. The petitioners' long delay and withholding of key facts led to the dismissal of claims over land requisitioned by the Ministry of Defence and acquired by HMT Ltd.

The Supreme Court of India allowed the appeal by HMT Ltd., dismissing the writ petition filed by the heirs of Putta Narasamma after several decades. T...