Search Results for "director guarantee"

1125 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1125 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Interim Order Restraining Non-Compete Beyond Contract Term. Arbitrator erred in treating Joint Venture Company as partnership and enforcing non-compete clause beyond its stipulated duration under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Commercial Arbitration Petition No.25 of 2021 was filed by Elster Instromet B.V. (Instromet) challenging an order dated 09/10/2020 passed by the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Liquidated Damages and Risk Cost Recovery Set Aside. Termination of Contract Held Legal but Recovery of Liquidated Damages Without Proving Actual Loss and Risk Cost Expenses Without Proper Justification Set Aside.

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL), a public se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pilots' Challenge to Command Training Selection in Air India — No Violation of Articles 14 and 16 Found. Selection based on seniority and merit was not arbitrary; employer's decision to withdraw earlier offer was justified due to operational exigencies.

The petitioners, pilots of Air India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30th September 2004 by wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions in Coal Supply Contract Dispute — Contractual Dispute Not Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction. Deduction of Rs.90/MT by Karnataka Power Corporation Limited from Coal Bills Challenged, but Court Holds Alternative Remedy of Arbitration Available.

The petitioners, M/s. EMTA Coal Limited and M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Deduction of Rs.90/MT by Karnataka Power Corporation Limited from Coal Bills — Contractual Dispute Not Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, M/s. EMTA Coal Limited and M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Disposes of Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Income Tax and GST Assessment Orders, Suo Motu Impleads State Bank of India. No specific legal finding or ratio is discernible from the available text.

The High Court of Madras heard a batch of writ petitions filed by multiple corporate entities, including Aqua Terra Coke and Energy Limited (formerly ...