Search Results for "arbitrary sanction"

1252 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1252 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition No. 3410 of 2004

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two writ petitions together. The petitioners, former Branch Manager and Accountant of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Order Regarding Development Licenses and Building Plans. Dispute Centers on Compliance with Town Planning Norms and Apartment Ownership Act.

The present batch of civil appeals, with the lead matter arising out of SLP(C) No. 11480 of 2020, originated from the judgment and order dated 10 July...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Maharashtra Entry Tax on Goods. Petitioners Argue That Differential Tax Burden on Imported LNG and Air Conditioners Violates Constitutional Provisions, Relying on Jindal Stainless Steel Principle.

Three writ petitions were heard together by the Bombay High Court, all challenging the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Tax on the Entry of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Government's Power to Constitute Anti Land Grabbing Special Cells Without Specific Legislation. High Court's Quashing of Government Orders Set Aside on Ground That Executive Orders for Investigation Do Not Require Statutory Definition of 'Land Grabbing'.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Government of Tamil Nadu against the common judgment of the Madras High Court dated 10.02.2015, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Plaint Rejection Upheld for Lack of Civil Court Jurisdiction. Dispute over mortgaged properties held to be exclusively triable by DRT under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi and Vandana (plaintiffs) against the Gadhinglaj Urban Co-operativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Ban on Transport of Banned Food Products Through Maharashtra. Inter-State Transport of Banned Products Not Prohibited Under Section 30(2)(a) of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

The petitioners, including the driver, cleaner, owner of a truck, and a transporter, challenged an order dated 15/7/2020 issued by the Food Safety Com...