Search Results for "Online payment failure"

1411 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1411 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Patwari in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay Ramdas Kalmegh, was a Patwari at Pimpri-Deshmukh, Maharashtra. The complainant, Raghunath Tandale, owned agricultural land and a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Housing Loan Disbursement — No Privity of Contract Between Complainant and Bank. Complainant Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as No Service Was Hired or Availed from the Appellant Bank.

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondent (original complainant) against the appellant bank before the National Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Deletion of Name from Provisional Voters List in Co-operative Society Election. Election Officer Exceeded Powers Under Rule 8 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 2014 by Adjudicating Membership Dispute.

The petitioner, Zamsingh s/o Bhuraji Yerne, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 13.02.2023 passed by the District Co-operative Election O...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Appellant Failed to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was rebutted by the accused, and the acquittal was proper.

The appellant, M/s. IVY Jewellery Pvt Ltd, a company dealing in diamond jewellery, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Due to Buyer's Acceptance of Refund During Pendency. Acceptance of Refund of Earnest Money Indicates Lack of Readiness and Willingness, Making Suit Not Maintainable Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell dated 25th January 2008, executed between the buyer (Respondent No.1) a...