Search Results for "Investment Ratio"

585 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 585 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Validity of RERA Order on Complaint Maintainability and Project Exemption. The Court Examines Whether a Project with Occupancy Certificate is Exempt from Registration Under Rule 4 of Karnataka Real Estate Rules.

The petitioner, a real estate promoter, challenged an order of the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority which rejected its application seeking d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court heard cross-appeals from NCLAT order partly reversing NCLT’s finding on trademark ownership during CIRP; cross-appeal challenged NCLT’s jurisdiction to determine title under Section 60(5) IBC.

The dispute originated in the corporate insolvency resolution process of Fort Gloster Industries Limited (corporate debtor), which was admitted into C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Against Service Tax on Seed Supply and Allows Writ Against Sales Tax on Franchise Agreement. Technology-Embedded Seed Supply Held to Be a Sale Under MVAT Act, While Franchise Licensing Held to Be a Service Under Finance Act.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard together two writ petitions concerning the tax characterisation of commercial transactions under the serv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Monsanto's Petition on Seed Supply as Sale, Allows Subway's Petition on Franchise as Service. Court Holds That Impregnated Seed Supply is Sale of Goods Under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, While Franchise Agreement is Not a Deemed Sale of Intellectual Property Rights.

The Bombay High Court adjudicated two writ petitions tagged together, raising the common issue of whether certain transactions were liable to service ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging Estate Officer’s Jurisdiction Under PP Act Against SARFAESI Possession. Asset Reconstruction Company Asserts SARFAESI Act Overrides PP Act, Requiring Landlord to Approach Debt Recovery Tribunal.

The writ petitioner, an Asset Reconstruction Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and registered under the SARFAESI Act, challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Against Partial Arbitral Awards in Koyna Hydro Electric Project Sub-Contract Dispute. Challenge to awards failing on grounds of settlement and coercion under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. (th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.891 OF 2010

The case arises from arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging arbitral awards. The peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Aurangabad Bench Hears First Appeals Against Common Decree in Two Special Civil Suits; Dispute Involves Recovery for Liquor Supplies and Refund of Security Deposit, Raising Issues of Adjustment, Burden of Proof, and Competency to Sue

These three first appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 arise from a common judgment dated 11-10-1999 by the 4th Joint Civil J...