WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 943 OF 2021
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court of India, in a combined proceeding, dealt with a batch of writ petitions, special leave petitions, and contempt petitions invoking A...
Search Results for "Article 227 writ jurisdiction"
3475 result(s) found
Found 3475 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Rent Enhancement Dispute Under Article 227. High Court Exceeded Supervisory Jurisdiction by Ordering Enhancement Without Remand.
1 Jan 2026The case involves a dispute between the State of Uttar Pradesh (appellant-tenant) and Raghvendra Nath Srivastava & Ors. (respondent-landlords) regardi...
- 103
High Court
High Court of Madras Quashes Ex-Parte Compromise Decree? – Revision Petitions Challenge Validity Under Order XXIII CPC. Alleged settlement decree in property suits passed without hearing all parties violated procedural safeguards of Order XXIII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
13 Mar 2026The two Civil Revision Petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India were filed against the common judgment and decree dated 11.12.2024 in ...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition in Eviction Dispute Due to Lack of Perversity in Concurrent Findings. Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 not to be used to reappreciate evidence; landlord failed to establish bona fide requirement under Rent Act.
6 Sep 2019The case involves a landlord-tenant dispute where the petitioners (landlord's legal heirs) sought eviction of the respondents (tenants) from a propert...
- 133
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — High Court Erred in Interfering with First Appellate Court's Findings on Adverse Possession. The Court restored the First Appellate Court's judgment that dismissed the suit for partition based on findings of adverse possession and limitation under Articles 65 and 64 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
1 Jan 2026The present appeal arises from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by Veerabasamma and Malakajamma (predecessors of some respondents) a...
- 76
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Partition Suit — Held That Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree Is Not Appealable Under Order XLIII Rule 1(d) CPC and Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Cannot Be Invoked When Alternative Remedy of Revision Under Section 115 CPC Is Available.
3 Apr 2013The petitioners, Nagananda and K.R. Hanumantha Raju, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated ...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Challenge to Concurrent Findings Declaring Tenant Under Section 70(b) of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Scope of Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Does Not Permit Re-appreciation of Evidence to Upset Findings of Fact Unless Patent Error Causing Grave Injustice is Established.
21 Feb 2011The dispute arose from a tenancy declaration under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, and a related land acquisition compensation ap...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenant for Non-User and Landlord's Bonafide Requirement Under Bombay Rent Act. Tenant's occasional use of premises does not constitute continuous residence; landlord's need for own use justified eviction.
12 Nov 2025The dispute arises from a suit for eviction filed by the landlord (respondent) against the tenant (petitioner) under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodgi...
- 305
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Maintenance Charge Demand Under Article 227. Alternative Remedy Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 Available; Petition Not Maintainable.
28 Aug 2018The petitioners, members of Link Apartment CHS Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the demand for a...
- 92
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal's Finding That 20 Persons Are Workmen Under Section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Court held that the Tribunal's finding based on evidence that employees performed manual, clerical, or supervisory work without managerial powers was not perverse and did not warrant interference under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.
28 Mar 2024The petitioner, Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Ltd., is an engineering company with a manufacturing plant called 'Interio Division' at Shirwal...
- 36
