Search Results for "ocular examination report"

678 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 678 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Unnatural Sex and Extortion Case — Mentally Ill Victim's Testimony Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Parents' Testimony Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 377 and 387 IPC.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Ramcharan Ramavadh Yadav against his conviction under Sections 377 and 387 read with Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Unlawful Assembly and Common Object Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves multiple criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Sessions Court convicting the appellants for the murder of one perso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction Under Sections 377, 387 IPC for Unnatural Sexual Intercourse with Mentally Ill Victim. Concurrent Findings of Credible Testimony of Victim with Mild Mental Retardation and Medical Evidence Upheld; No Leniency Granted Due to Gravity of Offence.

The High Court of Bombay considered a criminal revision application against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the sessions court convict...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Test Identification Parade. Homicidal Death Established but Identity of Accused Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302 and 450 IPC.

The case involves a criminal appeal against a High Court judgment that reversed the trial court's acquittal and convicted the appellant under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Solitary Eye Witness Testimony — FIR Not Ante-Timed, Light Source Sufficient for Identification. The court held that the testimony of a solitary eye witness, if reliable and corroborated, can sustain a conviction under Section 302 IPC.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by accused Kali Prasad Singh and Santosh Kumar Singh against their conviction under Section 302 IPC for the murder...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act and IPC — Medical Evidence and Victim's Testimony Sufficient. Child Victim's Consistent Testimony and Medical Report of Tear in Hymen Establish Offence Under Section 376(1) IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act.

The appellant, Nana @ Dnyneshwar Yerme, was convicted by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act and IPC for kidnapping and raping a four-year-old girl....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Prosecutrix Lacks Corroboration and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Shrikant Sukhdeo Borkar, was convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Sections 376, 323, and 342 IPC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of four accused persons (Yuvraj Yesaji Jodgan, Arun Ramu Gavali, Pundlik Ramcha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Thippeswamy @ Thippeshi, Nagendrappa @ Nagaraja, and Jayamma (appellants/accused Nos. 1 to 3) against the judg...