Search Results for "medical contradictions"

1599 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1599 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Eknath Pandurang Koli, was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Amalner, in Special Case No. 26 of 2014 for offences under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eye Witness. Acquittal of Accused Nos.1 and 2 Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 147, 148, 307 read with 149 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 18th February 1989 passed by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Kolhapur in S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Temple Election Dispute — Life Imprisonment Confirmed for Accused No.1 Under Section 302 IPC. Motive and Last Seen Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Despite Acquittal of Co-accused.

The appellant, Uttam Vaiju Majukar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadhinglaj, for the murder of Suresh Annappa Bhogan under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Motive. The court held that the sole eyewitness's identification of the accused in darkness was not credible, and the absence of motive weakened the prosecution's case under Section 302 IPC.

The case arises from an incident on 2 April 2002, where the deceased was assaulted with a sword and knife near Gupta building in Yavatmal. The prosecu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and various sections of the Indian Penal Code. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Accused's Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC, Examining Credibility of Dying Declaration. Court Analyzes Whether Dying Declaration Sufficient to Convict When Sole Eyewitness Hostile.

This criminal appeal arose from the conviction of Bapu (Nandu) Prabhu Koli @ Raut under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code by the Sessions Court, Os...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case — Dock Identification Reliable Despite Defective Test Identification Parade. Accused Convicted Under Sections 302 and 324 Read With 34 IPC After Eyewitnesses Identified Them in Court, Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

These three criminal appeals arose from the judgment and order dated 30 March 2013 passed by the Sessions Judge, Jalgaon in Sessions Case No. 187 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Delivers Oral Judgment in Multiple Appeals. Trial Court Had Convicted Twenty Accused for Murder and Attempt to Murder Following Gram Panchayat Election Revenge Attack; Complainant and State Appealed Against Acquittals.

The case arose from an incident on 26th October 2005 at village Badegaon, Saoner, Nagpur, following Gram Panchayat elections. Two rival groups, the De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Criminal Conspiracy and Murder Under Sections 120B, 302 r/w 34 IPC. Appeals Challenge Reliability of Eye-Witness Identification and Dying Declaration, Along with Conspiracy Evidence Against Accused Nos. 4 to 6.

The Bombay High Court heard five criminal appeals arising out of Sessions Case No.164 of 2011 decided by the Sessions Judge, Solapur on 8 May 2014. Th...