Search Results for "incorrect statement"

3060 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3060 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act Due to Lack of Tangible Material and Mere Change of Opinion. Reopening of Assessment After Full Disclosure and Acceptance of Logo Fee as Revenue Expenditure in Previous Years Held Impermissible.

The writ petition was filed by the assessee, a limited company manufacturing kitchen appliances, challenging a notice dated 11.02.2014 issued under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Multiparty Dispute Over Land Ownership and Compensation Under Inam Abolition Act. Privy Council Declaration of Inam Title and Forest Management Agreement Form Core of Dispute Over 157‑Acre Property Transferred to CIDCO Without Acquisition.

The dispute concerned a large parcel of land bearing Survey No. 51/0 at Ulwe, Raigad, originally granted in 1816. The Bivalkars claimed ownership thro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicated Three Writ Petitions Involving Ownership and Compensation for Land at Village Ulwe. The Petitions Raised Issues Under the Inam Abolition Act, Land Acquisition Act, and the Indian Forest Act Regarding Vesting, Compensation, and Restoration of Possession.

The dispute arose from three writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court concerning land bearing Survey No. 51/0 at village Ulwe, Taluka Panvel,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Reopening Beyond Four Years Requires Specific Disclosure Failure. General Statement of Non-Disclosure Not Sufficient Under Proviso to Section 147 Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, a real estate developer, challenged a notice dated 27/03/2019 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reopening the a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Restores Trial Court's Decree for Money Recovery Instead of Specific Performance. The High Court erred in granting specific performance as the transaction was found to be a loan with collateral security under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the subsequent purchasers (appellants) against the High Court's decree granting specific performance of an agr...