Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

803 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 803 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute Due to Limitation. Claim Filed Beyond Six-Month Period Under BSE Regulation 252(2) Is Barred.

The petitioner, Kalpana Munish Bumb, was a constituent of respondent no. 1, a trading member of the Bombay Stock Exchange. The last transaction betwee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Arbitrator's rejection of escalation claim due to absence of escalation clause upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, M/s. Gulraj Engineering Construction Co., a registered partnership firm, challenged an arbitral award dated 14 January 2009 passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Between Contractor and Indian Airlines. Failure of Named Arbitrator to Act Entitles Applicant to Court-Appointed Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, Vijay Hiralal Jaiswal, a sole proprietor of M/s. Three Circles, submitted a tender for construction works at Indian Airlines' NEC Sahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broking Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Contrary to Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality.

The petitioner, Bombay Construction and Engineering Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favour of Constituent in Stock Trading Dispute. Court upholds award based on documentary evidence and rejects challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Angel Capital & Debt Market Ltd., a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited, challenged an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award Due to Limitation and Abandonment. Claims raised after 12 years from contract termination held barred by limitation under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963 and deemed abandoned under contract terms.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award dated 19 July 2007 that had grante...