KAHC010448052021_1
7 Feb 2025These Miscellaneous First Appeals were filed by the Assistant Executive Engineer of Visvesvaraya Jala Nigam Limited, the acquiring body, challenging t...
Search Results for "Sale Price Determination"
1214 result(s) found
Found 1214 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates First Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Specific Performance. Cross Objection Filed by Defendants Challenges Direction to Repay with Interest.
21 Nov 2015The matter arose from a suit for specific performance filed by M/s. Gold Touch Real Estate Private Limited, a real estate developer, against six respo...
- 39
High Court
"Deputy Commissioner Cannot Exceed Revisional Jurisdiction Under Karnataka Municipalities Act – Karnataka High Court Quashes Building Licence and Khata Cancellation Orders for Violation of Natural Justice"
21 Jan 2026The petitioner challenged the orders dated 27.11.2013 and 02.08.2017 whereby the building licence granted in respect of the subject property was cance...
- 228
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Fixed at ₹90 per Square Metre. Comparable Sale Deed with Escalation and Deduction for Development Charges Applied Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
31 Aug 2017The case arises from an appeal by the original applicants (legal heirs of Pandu Y. Kubal) seeking enhancement of compensation for land acquired by the...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Essential Commodities Act Case for Lack of Sanction. Drugs Inspector Not Authorized to File Complaint Under Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
12 Jan 2011The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 11th March 1999 passed by the Special Judge at Latur in E.C. Act Case No...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Review and Rectification Orders in MVAT Case Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's claim for deduction under Rule 58 of MVAT Rules for works contract was wrongly rejected by review order passed beyond limitation period and without proper hearing.
3 Aug 2023The petitioner, Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd., challenged a review order dated 8th March 2021 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax under...
- 46
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition by Ex-Director Against Company for Disputed Interest Claim. Company Petition under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 dismissed as debt was bona fide disputed and no written agreement for interest existed.
22 Jul 2016The petitioner, Mr J R Srinivasa, an ex-director of the respondent company Sree Gururaja Enterprises Pvt Ltd, filed a winding up petition under Sectio...
- 59
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute, Upholds High Court's Determination of Market Value. The Court affirmed that compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 must be based on market value at the time of notification, rejecting the cumulative increase method and standardizing compensation for similar lands acquired for the same public purpose.
8 Apr 2021The dispute arose from the acquisition of lands in Haryana for setting up an Industrial Model Township, Phase-VI, Manesar, Gurgaon, under the Land Acq...
- 578
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Perversity in Awarding Damages for Breach of Agreement for Sale of Land. The court found that the arbitral tribunal failed to consider mitigation of damages and made a perverse computation of damages based on an incorrect price per acre.
8 Jul 2022The case involves a commercial appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Jagannath Parmeshwar Mills Private Limi...
- 47
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Partially Allows Appeal by Land Acquisition Officer in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Reduces Enhanced Compensation from Rs.160 to Rs.80 per sqm Due to Inadequate Deductions for Development Charges. The court held that the Reference Court erred in relying on sale instances without proper comparability evidence and in making only 5% deduction for development, warranting a 50% deduction.
16 Jul 2020The Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) appealed against the judgment and award of the Reference Court (District Judge-2, Panaji) dated 29 October 2015 in ...
- 94
