Search Results for "Reference court enhancement"

1560 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1560 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Property Dispute Between Siblings. Court holds that amendment seeking to add alternative claim for partition and separate possession does not change the nature of the suit and is necessary for effective adjudication.

The petitioners, Barkatali Abdul Razzak Kazi, Noorjahan Gafoor Shijwalkar, and Aishabi Jabbar Thakur, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Injury Claim — Tribunal's Award of Rs.15 Lakhs Enhanced to Rs.27 Lakhs for 70% Disabled Mechanical Engineer. Loss of Earning Capacity Reassessed with 50% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 14 Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Pratap Dandapani Padhi, a 43-year-old Mechanical Engineer working as a Foreman at Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Limited with a monthly s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court considers legality of State interference in recruitment by an autonomous technical institute. The dispute centers on the scope of autonomy under Government Resolutions and the power of the Board of Governors to make appointments without State oversight.

The College of Engineering, Pune (CoEP), established in 1854, is a premier technical institute. In 2002, under the Technical Education Quality Improve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition in Redevelopment Dispute — Dissenting Member Cannot Obstruct Majority Decision for Dilapidated Building. Court Appoints Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Resolve Dispute Between Developer, Society, and Dissenting Member.

The Bombay High Court dealt with an arbitration petition filed by Chirag Infra Projects Pvt Ltd, the developer, against Vijay Jwala Cooperative Housin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Satish Ganapati Gunagi, was convicted by the JMFC, Ankola in C.C. No. 62/2007 for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving),...