Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority"

1036 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1036 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Additional FSI Grant Under DCR Regulation 33(1) — Petitioner's Lack of Locus Standi and Failure to Establish Public Wrong Leads to Dismissal of Petition Seeking to Protect Mill Workers' Housing Rights.

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, claiming to be a social activist and environmentalist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Sanction Procedure Under D.C. Regulations. Court Considers Whether First Come First Serve Principle Applies to Competing Applications for Slum Redevelopment Under Regulation 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for the City of Mumbai, 1991.

The petitioners, a proposed co-operative housing society of hutment dwellers residing on a plot of land measuring about 15,600 sq. mtrs. in Malad, Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Second Bail Application in Economic Offence Case Due to No Change in Circumstances. Applicant's Role as Director in Fraudulent Transactions Upheld; Gravity of Offence Precludes Bail.

The applicant, Waryam Singh Kartar Singh, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds PMC's Demolition Notices for Illegal Green Belt Constructions in Pune. Petitioners' Plea for Regularization Rejected; Costs Imposed for Violations of Environmental Regulations

The petitioners challenge the demolition notices issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) for illegal structures built in the green belt zone on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Slum Land Acquisition Despite Interim Stay on Declaration — Acquisition Under Section 14 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Valid as Stay Did Not Cover Acquisition Proceedings

The petitioners, Murlidhar Teckchand Gandhi and others, owned property bearing CTS No. 165, 165/1 to 51 at Village Kanjur, Mumbai. The property was de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Slum Land Acquisition Despite Interim Stay on Declaration. Acquisition Under Section 14 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Held Independent of Declaration Under Section 4, Not Barred by Interim Order.

The petitioners, Murlidhar Teckchand Gandhi and others, challenged the acquisition of their property bearing CTS No. 165, 165/1 to 51 at Village Kanju...