KAHC010026042017_1
9 Mar 2018...
Search Results for "Jurisdictional Objection"
1388 result(s) found
Found 1388 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Against State Consumer Commission Order in Dispute Over Electricity Tariff Reclassification. Petitioners, an electricity supply company, challenged the State Commission's order, but respondents argued that the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 provides an alternative remedy of appeal to the National Commission, raising the issue of whether the High Court should entertain the writ petition.
17 Oct 2022The Mangalore Electricity Supply Company Ltd. (petitioners) filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging the order...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging DRAT's Waiver of Pre-Deposit and Setting Aside of DRT Order Under SARFAESI Act; Auction Purchaser Disputes Complete Waiver Under Section 18 and Reversal of DRT's Dismissal of Securitisation Application.
30 Nov 2016The writ petition was filed by an auction purchaser under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging two orders of the Debt Recovery Appell...
- 13
High Court
High Court Holds in Review Petition that CPC Amendments under Commercial Courts Act Do Not Apply to Commercial Disputes Below Specified Value. The 120‑day limit for written statement under Order VIII Rule 1 of CPC, 1908 as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is inapplicable to suits where the Specified Value is below Rs. 3 lakhs, even if the suit is before the Commercial Division under the proviso to Section 7.
1 Jun 2019The dispute arose in a commercial suit where the Plaintiff had determined the Specified Value at Rs. 20,000, which was below the threshold of Rs. 3 la...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Addresses Jurisdictional Clash Between Forward Markets Commission and Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Over Electricity Futures Trading. The Court Considered Whether the Electricity Act, 2003 Overrides the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952, and Whether the Power Market Regulations 2010 Framed by CERC Were Ultra Vires.
7 Feb 2011The matter involved two writ petitions being heard together by the Bombay High Court, arising from a jurisdictional conflict between two regulatory bo...
- 34
High Court
High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Compensation for Land Acquired by BDA, Filed by Agreement Holder. Agreement Executed After Preliminary Notification Held Void; Suppression of Civil Suit and Lack of Title Preclude Compensation.
21 Jul 2025The petitioner, claiming to be an agreement holder in respect of certain lands notified for acquisition by the Bangalore Development Authority for the...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Chief Officer in Municipal Corporation — Appointment Set Aside for Violation of Statutory Rules and Lack of Consultation with Director of Municipal Administration. The court held that the requirement of consultation with the Director of Municipal Administration under Section 54 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 and Rule 4 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils (Chief Officers) Recruitment Rules, 1975 is mandatory and failure to consult renders the appointment void.
3 May 2023The petitioner, Shri Pradip Bapurao Jambhale-Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the appointment of Respondent No.1, Smt. Smita Gangaram Zagade, ...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Wakf Tribunal Order Confirming Board's Decision to Appoint Committee for Mosque Management. Dispute over management of Jumma Masjid Trust under Wakf Act, 1995 - Court upholds Board's power to appoint committee under Section 65 of the Act.
29 Apr 2010The applicant, Mansoor s/o Kasim Mulla, claimed to be the founder member and President of the Jumma Masjid Trust at Gadhinglaj, Kolhapur. The Trust wa...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Patent Infringement Suit — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction as Plaintiff Failed to Establish Infringement of Patent. Court Held That Mere Grant of Patent Does Not Confer Right to Injunction Without Clear Evidence of Infringement and Balance of Convenience Lies with Defendant.
16 Mar 2012The appellant, CTR Manufacturing Industries Limited, filed a suit for patent infringement against the respondents, Sergi Transformer Explosion Prevent...
- 109
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Refusing Interim Relief in Share Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against EGM and Share Transfer. Court held that balance of convenience did not favour restraining the holding company from exercising its voting rights and that the appellants failed to establish a strong prima facie case for the relief sought.
13 Feb 2019The case involves a dispute between the appellants (Ravi Arya, Nakul Arya, Sushma Arya, Varun Arya, and Ravi Arya HUF) and the respondents, including ...
- 121
